Document Type : Short Communication

Authors

1 Department of Aquatic Animal Health and Diseases, Caspian Sea Ecology Research Center, Sari, Iran

2 DVM Graduate, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran

Abstract

The present study was conducted to evaluate the status of the parasite fauna in Acipenser persicus at different development stages, in order to find prevention protocols for parasitic diseases in this valuable species. For this purpose, sampling from each sex breeder, 10 egg samples, 5-day-old larvae (n = 20), 20-day-old larvae (n = 80) and fingerling of A. persicus (n = 60) released in earthen ponds were done. After the bioassay and preparing wet mount from the internal and external organs, identification was done according to the keys. According to the results, no fauna parasites were isolated from egg samples and 5-day-old larvae; but Trichodina spp. was isolated from 20-day-old larvae. Also, the same protozoan was isolated from fingerling released in earthen ponds, the mean intensity, prevalence and range of contamination by fingerling were higher with compared to 20-day-old larvae. Trichodina sp. and Diplostomum spathaceum were isolated from skin and eyes of females, respectively. However, Trichodina sp. and Ichthyophthirius multifiliis were isolated from skin of male breeders. In this study, no parasites were isolated from internal organs of larves and fingerling but four intestinal parasites included: Cucullanus sphaerocephlaus, Anisakis sp., Skyrjabinopsilus semiarmatus, and Lepto-rhynchoides plagicephalu were isolated from internal organs of breeder. Based on a wide range of parasitic infection observed in various life stages of A. persicus, it seems necessary to consider hygienic and management measures.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Introduction

 

Acipenser persicus is one of the most important species in the family of Acipenseridae which its meat and caviar are considered economically. This fish is distributed along by Koura River (Azerbaijan) and Sefidrood River (Iran).1 During the past two decades, overfishing, loss of habitat for natural reproduction, industrial and domestic pollution and increase of infectious diseases puts the reservoir in alarming rate.1 Therefore, artificial culture of A. persicus has been increased in aquaculture industry of Iran. In-breeding and rearing sturgeon aquaculture requires comprehensive information about health status and diseases, not only conduce to the promotion of health and quality of sturgeon, but also could have an important role in the production and proliferation of endangered species.2

Parasitical pathogens could effect on physiological and biological features and their mechanical damages may also predispose fish to the viral, bacterial and fungal disease and cause severe mortality.3 Therefore, identification of infectious pathogenic parasites could be helpful in proliferation and rearing of different sturgeon species, especially A. persicus.

So far, more than 60 species of parasites in sturgeons of the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea have been recorded.4 The first study in parasitic fauna of sturgeons in Iran, was done by Mokhayer in 1973 which reported Amphilina pholiacea.4 Subsequently, Niyak et al., Mokhayer, Shenavar Masouleh, Pazooki and Masoumian, Sattari and Mokhayer, Bazari Moghaddam et al. and Noei investigated the parasitic fauna of different sturgeon species and identified different parasitic species, i.e., Ichthyophthiriusmultifiliis, Diplostomum spathaceum,5 Trichodina reticulata,6 Cryptobia acipenseris,7 Polypodium hydriforme,7 Hemogregarina acipenseris,7 Skrjabinopsolus skrjabini, S. acipenseris, Amphilina foliacea, Bothrimonus fallax, Eubothrium acipenserinum,8 Ascarophis ovotrichuria, Cyclozone acipenserina, Cucullanus sphaero-cephalus, Contracaecum sp., Anisakis sp.,8 Eustrongylides excisus, Leptorhynchoides plagicephalus, Pomphorhynchus laevis, Corynosoma capsicum and Ligula intestinalis,9 but there is no published information about parasitic fauna of cultured A. persicus in different growth stages.

This study was conducted to investigate the parasitic fauna of cultured A. persicus (in propagation and rearing sturgeon centers) in different growth stages of life in northern of Iran.

 

Materials and Methods

 

This study was conducted in Shahid Rajaee Propagation and Rearing Center in the north of Iran. The experiments were conducted under identical conditions, following completely randomized design.8 A total of 5 samples from each sex breeders, 10 egg samples from female breeders, 20 samples from 5-day-old larvae, 80 samples from 20-day-old larvae and 60 samples from fingerling (that released in earthen ponds) were selected randomly. Samples were transferred by plastic bags contained oxygen to central laboratory of the Caspian Sea Institute, Sari, Iran.8

After the biometric measurements, wet mount from internal and external organs of larvae, skin, fins, gills and eyes of fingerling and breeders were prepared.10 After the preparation of wet smear, external parasites was identified by Bazari Moghaddam et al. key, using Klein's silver impregnation technique.9 In order to investigate gastro-intestinal parasites, macroscopic examination was done and then the entrails of the fish were removed. Also, approximately 50 to 60 eggs samples were collected from the ovary of female breeders and transferred to the central laboratory of the Caspian Sea Institute.

All collectedparasites specimenswere removed and stored in 70% alcohol. Then,cestodes, trematodes and acanthocephalans were stained with aqueous aceto-carmine and nematodes were cleared in lacto phenol.11 The specimens were identified byBauer and Moravec keys.12,13

Statisticalanalysis. The data were subjected to statistical analysis using the SPSS (Version 18; SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA). Results of this study were analyzed statistically using One – way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the significance level was expressed as p < 0.05. Also, Tukey’s test applied to compare between different groups. Mean intensity was determined by dividing the total number of recovered parasites to the number of infected fish samples. Prevalence was also calculated by dividing the number of infected fish samples by the total number of examined ones and expressed as a percentage.

 

Results

 

According to the results, no parasite species were isolated from 5-day larvae with a mean weight of 54.6 ± 8.56 mg and mean length of 19.6 ± 0.96 mm (p > 0.05, r = 0.024), while protozoan Trichodina sp. was identified (Fig. 1A), from 20-day-old larvae with a mean weight of 78.50 ± 0.60 mg and mean length of 25.40 ± 0.51 mm  (p > 0.05, r = 031). Mean intensity, prevalence and range of infection to Trichodina sp. were 2.50 ± 2.20, 13.90% and 1-3, respectively (Table 1). This protozoon was isolated from fingerling that released in earthen ponds (with a mean weight of 415.60 ± 39.67 mg and mean length of 40.60 ± 5.96 mm;p > 0.05, r = 035), the mean intensity, prevalence and range of infection fingerling were higher than 20-day-old larvae (p = 0.01, df = 2). In female breeders (with a mean weight of 31.14 ± 0.15 kg and mean length of 164.00 ± 0.96 cm; p > 0.05, r = 0.058), two parasites including: Trichodina sp. from skin and D. spathaceum from the eyes were isolated (Fig. 1B). Intensity, prevalence and range of infection of Trichodina sp. and D. spathaceum were calculated 8.12 ± 6.63, 40.00%, 1-4 and 1.26 ± 5.26, 20%, 1-6, respectively (p > 0.05, r = 0.034), (Table 1).


 

 

Fig. 1. A) Trichodina sp. isolated from skin of 20 day larvae. B) Diplostomum spathaceum isolated from the eye of female breeder (100×).

 

 

Table 1. External parasites in various stages of reproduction and rearing of Acipenser persicus. Data are presented as mean ± SD.

Sample

No.

Weigh

Total length

Parasites

Intensity

Prevalence (%)

Range

Female breeder

5

31.14 ± 0.15 kg

164.00 ± 0.96 cm

Trichodina sp.

8.12 ± 6.63

20

1 - 4

I. multifiliis

0

0

0

D. spathaceum

1.26 ± 5.26

20

1 - 6

Male breeder

5

30.90 ± 0.14 kg

165.00 ± 0.19 cm

Trichodina sp.

11.76 ± 18.64

50

2 - 20

I. multifiliis

138.50 ± 146.64

50

10 - 267

D. spathaceum

0

0

0

20 day larvae

80

78.50 ± 0.60 mg

     25.40 ± 0.51 mm

Trichodina sp.

2.50 ± 2.20

13.90

1 - 3

I. multifiliis

0

0

0

D. spathaceum

0

0

0

Fingerlings

60

415.60 ± 39.67 mg

     40.60 ± 5.96 mm

Trichodina sp.

9.56 ± 5.50

35.70

2 - 36

I. multifiliis

0

0

0

D. spathaceum

0

0

0

 

Two protozoi including: Trichodina sp. and I. multifiliis were isolated from skin of male breeders with a mean weight of 30.90 ± 0.14 kg and mean length of 165.00 ± 0.19 cm (p > 0.05, r = 0.126), (Fig. 2, Table 1). Intensity, prevalence and range of infection in male breeders was estimated 11.76 ± 18.64, 50.00%, 2-20 and 138.50 ± 146.64, 50.00%, 10-267, respectively (p > 0.05,r = 0.051).

Fig. 2. Ichthyophthirius multifiliis isolated from the skin of sturgeon fingerlings (40×).

 

In this investigation, no parasites were detected from internal organs of larvaes and fingerling but four intestinal parasites, including: Cucullanus sphaerocephlaus, Anisakis sp., S. semiarmatus, and L. splagicephalu were isolated from internal organs of the breeders (Figs. 3A and 3B, Tables 2).

 

Table 2. Internal parasites in various stages of reproduction and rearing of Acipenser persicus (n = 5). Data are presented as mean ± SD.

Sample

Weigh

Total length

Parasites

Intensity

Prevalence (%)

Range

Female breeder

31.14 ± 0.15 kg

 164.00 ± 0.96 cm

C. sphaerocphlaus

10.32 ± 18.50

40

3-17

L. plagicephalus

5.62 ± 6.60

20

1-5

S. semiarmatus

1.67 ± 1.15

20

1-2

Anisakis sp.

1.23 ± 2.63

10

1-3

Male breeder

30.90 ± 0.14 kg

165.00 ± 0.19 cm

C. sphaerocphlaus

20.59 ± 32.5

40

15-25

L. plagicephalus

1.78 ± 3.25

20

1-4

S. semiarmatus

4.50 ± 1.50

40

3-6

Anisakis sp.

0

0

0

 

In this survey, Anisakis sp. was isolated (Fig. 3) only from intestine of male breeds (10.00%), while others were found in both sex breeders (p < 0.05, r = 0.034). In intestinal infection, Cucullanus sphaerocephlaus had the highest intensity and frequency which, were observed in both examined sex breeders (p > 0.05, r = 0.124).

 

Fig. 3. A) Anterior end of Anisakis sp. isolated from intestinal of male breeder (40×); B) Cucullanus sphaerocephalus isolated from intestinal of male breeder (100×); C) Posterior end of Anisakis sp. isolated from intestinal of male breeder (40×).

 

Discussion

 

In recent years, due to losses in A. persicus stocks in the Caspian Sea, many researchers have paid attention to revive the sources of this valuable species.1 By increasing and developments in rearing of sturgeons in ponds of Iran, identification of pathogenic agents in order to apply the best methods of prevention and treatment seemed necessary.

In this study, no parasites were isolated from 5-day-old larvae of A. persicus; but Trichodina sp. was isolated from 20-day-old larvae, these results were similar to Bazari Moghaddam et al. study. This finding may be related to the short larval rearing period in Vniro ponds (varied between 2-3 weeks), absence of intermediate hosts and also the lower water temperature in ponds compared to fingerlings in earthen ponds and lower organic load in Vniro ponds, presence of parasitic agents seemed lower than in rearing in earthen ponds.9-11

 In Shahid Rajaee complex the fingerlings of A. persicus infection to Trichodina sp.(36.70%) were in line with our findings.6 However, in studies conducted by Ghoroghi the contamination percent of A. persicus fingerlings compared to Trichodina sp. was 22.00%, in our data showed lower numbers.14 Results obtained from the studies conducted by Shenavar Masouleh et al., indicate that intensity and contamination range of Trichodina reticulate infestation in A. persicus fingerlings at the first week in earthen ponds were 20.00 to 30.00% and 2 to 10, respectively,6 that compared to our results was higher.

Similar to our results, in Shenavar Masouleh et al. study, D. spathaceum was not observed in the first week in earthen ponds. Limitation on the maintenance time in raising ponds and consequently the uncompleted life cycle of parasites, the presence of a small number of intermediate hosts, un-favorable temperature conditions for parasite growth are the possible reasons for the limited number of parasites during raising period of fingerlings in ponds.

This study showed the presence of four intestinal parasites, including: L. plagicephalus, S. semiarmatus, C. sphaerocephlaus, Anisakissp. in A. persicus breeders. Ali Mohammadi et al. isolated the same parasites from A. persicus breeders on the southern coast of the Caspian Sea.15 Also, Sattari and Khara et al. not only reported these parasites, but also isolated Eustrongylides excicus in sturgeon’s species in southwest coast of Caspian Sea.16,17 Ghoroghi reported seven intestinal parasites in A. persicus and indicated that C. sphaerocephlaus and S. semiarmatus had the highest intensity and contamination rate.14 Also, Bazari Moghaddam found that C. sphaerocephlaus had the highest intensity and contamination rate between intestenial parasites in A. persicus breeders,11 these results was similar to our results and confirmed it. The increase in these parasite communities may be related to the occurrence of Nereids (polychaeta), the intermediate host for C. sphaerocephalus.6

In the present study, Anisakis sp. was only found in male breeders. However, Ali Mohammadi et al. reported this nematoda in both sex of breeders.15 Sattari and Sattari and Mokhayer isolated Anisakis sp. from other sturgeon species such as: Huso huso and A. persicus.8,16 By considering the high ability of this nematode to cause disease in humans and creating the allergic reactions, comprehensive studies on Anisakidea and other zoonotic parasites in sturgeons species seems to be essential.18-20

Due to important roles and negative effects of parasites infection in different growth stages of life in sturgeons and based on the results of previous studies,15-18 it seems following protocols should be observed; proper pond designing, controlling the water quality and quantity, using of disinfections, controlling of snails and aquatic birds as intermediate hosts, improving nutrition and decreasing stress condition in order to reduce the numbers of parasites infection and improvement on the health conditions of culturedsturgeons.19 Based on the results, periodic parasitical examination can contribute to the control of fish parasite and a reduction in the economic losses in propagation and rearing center of sturgeons species.

 

Acknowledgements

 

The authors appreciate our colleagues at Department of Aquatic Animal Health and Diseases, Research Organization of Caspian Sea, Sari, Iran for technical helping.

  1.  

    1. Bahmani M, Kazemi R, Donskaya P. A comparative study of some hematological features in young reared sturgeon. Fish Physiol Biochem 2001; 24(2): 135-140.
    2. Barber I. Parasites, behaviour and welfare in fish. J Appl Anim Sci 2007: 104(8): 251- 264.
    3. Noei MR. Parasitic worms of Acipenser stellatus, A. gueldenstaedtii, A. nudiventris and Huso huso (Chondrostei: Acipenseridae) from thesouthwest shores of the Caspian Sea. Caspian J Environ Sci 2011;9(2): 257-266.
    4. Mokhayer B. Parasites listed sturgeon (Acipenseridae) of Iran. DVM Thesis. University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran: 1973.
    5. Niyak A, Kohne Shahri M, Azari Takami G. Trichodina infection in Caspian Sea sturgeons, DVM Thesis. Tehran University, Tehran, Iran: 1970.
    6. Shenavar Masouleh A, Sattari M, Masoumian M, et al. Final report of project: Qualitative and quantitative study of sturgeon fingerlings (quality control). Tehran, Iran: Iranian Fisheries Research Organization 2003: 166-173.
    7. Pazooki J, Masoumian M. Cryptobia acipenseris and haemogregarina Acipenseris infections in Acipenser guldenstaedti and Acipenser persicus in the southern part of the Caspian Sea. J Agr Sci Technol 2004; 6(2):
      95-101.
    8. Sattari M, Mokhayer B. Occurrence and intensity of some parasitic worms in Acipenser gueldenstaedti and
      A. nudiventris. J Vet Anim Sci 2005; 29(3); 1279-1284.
    9. Bazari Moghaddam S, Mokhayer B, Masoumian M, et al. Parasitic infection among larvae and fingerlings of the Persian sturgeon (Acipenser persicus) in Vniro tanks and earthen ponds. Iran J Fish Sci 2010; 9(3): 342-351.
    10. Jalali B. Parasites and parasitic diseases of Iran's fresh water fishes. 3rd ed. Tehran, Iran: Iranian Fishery Institute 1997: 323- 328.
    11. Bazari Moghaddam S. Study on internal helminthes parasites in Persian sturgeon (Acipenser persicus) spawners in southwest coasts of the Caspian Sea (2009-2011). Life Sci J 2013; 10(10): 12-16.
    12. Bauer ON, Voronin VN. Study of parasites and diseases of sturgeon in Russia. A Review. J Appl Ichthyol 2002; 18(4): 420-429.
    13. Moravec F. Parasitic nematodes of freshwater of Europe. 3rd ed. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994: 87-95.
    14. Ghoroghi A. Sturgeon fingerlings. Iran Fish Sci Bull 1996; 2: 11-22.
    15. Ali Mohammadi SR, Hossenifard SM, Ghazi, A. Survey parasitic infections of breeder sturgeon caught from the southwest coast of the Caspian Sea. J Vet Res 2010; 5(2): 15-19.
    16. Sattari M. Prevalence of parasitic infections of domestic sturgeon caught from the southwest coast of the Caspian Sea. PhD Thesis. University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran: 1999.
    17. Khara H, Satari M, Yousefi R, et al. Intestinal parasitic of sturgeon caught from the coastal of the Caspian Sea (West of Mazandaran). Biol J 2010; 4(4): 29-36.
    18. Aghaei Moghaddam AA, Haghparast S, Pazooki J, et al. Prevalence of helminth and nematode parasites in digestive tract, skin surface and blood of Sturgeon broodstocks from southeast of the Caspian Sea. Iran J Biol 2014: 27(1): 1-12.
    19. Bazari Moghaddam S, Mokhayer B, Shenavar Masouleh AR, et al. Study on prevalence of parasites in Persian sturgeon (Acipenser persicus) spawners in the southwest coasts of the Caspian Sea [Persian]. J Utiliz Cult Aqua 2012: 1(4): 69-79.
    20. Daghigh Roohi J, Sattari M, Asgharnia M, et al. Occurrence and intensity of parasites in European catfish, Silurus glanis L., 1758 from the Anzali Wetland, southwest of the Caspian Sea, Iran. Croat J Fish 2014; 72(5): 25-31.