Multiple ovulation and embryo transfer during the breeding season in Angora goats: A comparison of fresh and vitrified-thawed embryo transfer

Document Type : Original Article


1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey

2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey


This study aimed to assess the superovulation response and pregnancy rates of fresh and vitrified-thawed embryos after transfer in Angora goats with comparing transfer at the beginning (BS) and end (ES) of the breeding season. Nine Angora goats were used as donors in both periods. Donor goats were synchronized and superovulated with the FSH and mated with five fertile bucks. At 156 hr following mating, embryos were collected surgically. Recipient Angora goats were divided into two groups at the beginning (fresh, n=15; vitrified-thawed, n=15) and end (fresh, n = 8; vitrified-thawed, n = 8) of the breeding season. Fresh or vitrified-thawed grade I embryos (early blastocyst/blastocyst) were transferred surgically to synchronized recipients. On the 30th, 60th and 90th day of transfer, goats were examined by ultrasonography. The number of corpora lutea (CL), total oocyte/embryo and transferable embryos obtained in BS was found to be statistically higher than ES. On the 30th day of transfer, pregnancy rates were 73.30% and 75.00% in the fresh transfer groups in both BS and ES periods; while, rates of 20.00% and 37.50% were found in the vitrified-thawed group, respectively. The embryo survival rates of fresh transfers were 55.55% and 31.25% at BS and ES, respectively. The number of CL, total oocyte/embryo and transferable embryos in the BS was higher than ES following superovulation. Also, fresh embryo transfer can be successfully carried out during the breeding season in Angora goats. Moreover, although pregnancies were obtained following the transfer of vitrified-thawed embryos, they did not sustain on the 60th and 90th days. So, further studies are needed for the vitrified-thawed embryos.


  1. Ağaoğlu AR, Kaymaz M, Ağaoğlu OK, et al. Effect of different gonadotropin preparation on ovulatory response and embryo yield in Karayaka ewes. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2012; 18(5): 861-864.
  2. Cognié Y, Baril G, Poulin N, et al. Current status of embryo technologies in sheep and goat. Theriogenology 2003; 59(1): 171-188. 
  3. Gibbons A, Cueto M. Embryo Transfer in Sheep and Goats. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Bariloche Experimental Station. National Institute for Agricultural Technology. 2011; 1-33.
  4. Lehloenya KC. Multiple ovulation and embryo transfer in goats. PhD Thesis, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, Republic of South Africa. 2008.
  5. Taşdemir U, Ağaoğlu AR, Kaymaz M, et al. Ovarian response and embryo yield of Angora and Kilis goats given the day 0 protocol for superovulation in the non-breeding season. Tropic Anim Health Prod 2011; 43(5): 1035-1038.
  6. Gonźalez-Bulnes A, Baird DT, Campbell BK, et al. Multiple factors affecting the efficiency of multiple ovulation and embryo transfer in sheep and goats. Reprod Fertil Dev 2004; 16(4): 421-435.
  7. Lehloenya KC, Greyling JPC. The ovarian response and embryo recovery rate in Boer goat does following different superovulation protocols, during the breeding season. Small Ruminant Res 2010; 88(1): 38-43.
  8. Baril G, Vallet JC. Time of ovulations in dairy goats induced to superovulate with porcine follicle stimulating hormone during and out of the breeding season. Theriogenology 1990; 34(2): 303-311.
  9. Amiridis GS, Cseh S. Assisted reproductive technologies in the reproductive management of small ruminants. Anim Reprod Sci 2012; 130(3-4): 152-161.
  10. Sağirkaya H, Bağiş H. Cryopreservation of mammalian embryos [Turkish]. Uludağ Univ Vet Fac Derg 2003; 22(1-2-3): 127-135.
  11. Vajta G, Kuwayama M. Improving cryopreservation systems. Theriogenology 2006; 65(1): 236-244.
  12. Gibbons A, Cueto MI, Bonnet FP. A simple vitrification technique for sheep and goat embryo cryo-preservation. Small Ruminant Res 2011; 95(1): 61-64.
  13. Robertson I, Nelson RE. Certification and identification of embryos. In: Stringfellow DA, Givens MD (EDs). Manual of the international embryo transfer society. 4th ed. Champaign, USA: International Embryo Transfer Society (IETS) 2010; 86-105.
  14. Pampukidou A, Alifakiotis T, Avdi M, et al. Superovulation and embryo transfer in goats by using PMSG or FSH. Agric Sci Technol 2011; 3(2): 94-97.
  15. Gonzalez-Bulnes A, Santiago-Moreno J, Cocero MJ, et al. Effects of FSH commercial preparation and follicular status on follicular growth and superovulatory response in Spanish Merino ewes. Theriogenology 2000; 54 (7): 1055-1064.
  16. Greyling JPC, van der Nest M, Schwalbach LMJ, et al. Superovulation and embryo transfer in South African Boer and Indigenous feral goats. Small Ruminant Res 2002; 43(1):45-51.
  17. Goel AK, Agrawal KP. Ovulatory response and embryo yield in Jakhrana goats following treatments with PMSG and FSH. Trop Anim Health Prod 2005; 37(7): 549-558.
  18. Selvaraju S, Agarwal SK, Karche SD, et al. Ovarian response, embryo production and hormonal profile in superovulated goats treated with insulin. Theriogenology 2003; 59(5-6): 1459-1468.
  19. Sánchez-Dávila F, Ledezma-Torres RA, Padilla-Rivas G, et al. Effect of three pFSH doses on superovulation and embryo quality in goats during two breeding seasons in north-eastern Mexico. Reprod Domest Anim 2014; 49(4): e40-e43. doi: 10.1111/rda.12350.
  20. Ağaoğlu AR, Karakaş K, Kaymaz M. In vivo embryo production in some native goat breeds in Turkey. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2014; 38: 238-244.
  21. Chang Z, Fan X, Luo M, et al. Factors affecting superovulation and embryo transfer in Boer goats. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2006; 19(3): 341-346.
  22. Mapletoft RJ, Steward KB, Adams GP. Recent advances in the superovulation in cattle. Reprod Nutr Dev 2002; 42(6): 601-611.
  23. Menchaca A, Miller V, Salveraglio V, et al. Endocrine, luteal and follicular responses after the use of the short-term protocol to synchronize ovulation in goats. Anim Reprod Sci 2007; 102(1-2): 76-87.
  24. Lehloenya KC, Greyling JPC, Grobler S. Can repeated superovulation and embryo recovery in Boer goats limit donor participation in a MOET programme? S Afr J Anim Sci 2009; 39(5): 193-197.
  25. Cognie Y. State of the art in sheep-goat embryo transfer. Theriogenology 1999; 51(1): 105-116.
  26. Paramio MT. In vivo and in vitro embryo production in goats. Small Ruminant Res 2010; 89(2-3): 144-148.
  27. Paramio MT, Izquierdo D. Assisted reproduction technologies in goats. Small Ruminant Res 2014; 121(1): 21-26.
  28. Flores-Foxworth G. Reproductive biotechnologies in the goat. In: Youngquist, RS, Threlfall WR (EDs). Current therapy in large animal theriogenology. 2nd ed. Missouri, USA: Saunders 2007; 603-614.
  29. Shin ST, Jang SK, Yang HS, et al. Laparoscopy vs. laparotomy for embryo transfer to produce transgenic goats (Capra hircus). J Vet Sci 2008; 9(1): 103-107.