Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Department of Theriogenology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

4 Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

The macrolides appear to have considerable effects for treatment of bovine mastitis because of excellent diffusion into the mammary gland, long half-life, low protein binding, high intracellular concentration and lipid solubility. Acquired resistance to macrolides in Staphylococcus aureus is primarily related to target-site modification through acquisition of an erm gene. In the present study the prevalence of both phenotypic and genotypic tylosin resistance in S. aureus isolates (n = 103) from subclinical mastitis in nine dairy farms belonging to three different province of Iran were investigated. Overall, ermA, ermB and ermC was found in 7.80%, 32.00%, and 20.40% of S.aureus isolates, respectively. A very high percent of isolates (56.90%) were resistant to tylosin. MIC90 and MIC50 values were 64 and 32 µg mL-1, respectively. Most of tylosin resistant isolates did not harbour any erm gene but ermB was dominant gene among 58 tylosin resistant isolates of S. aureus. In overall, tylosin resistance was prevalent in S. aureus isolates obtained from bovine mastitis in Iran.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Introduction

 

Bovine mastitis is the most prevalent production disease affecting dairy farms worldwide, accounting for 38.00% of direct costs incurred by the dairy industry.1 Staphylococcus aureus is considered one of the most important pathogens in bovine mastitis. Effective control of S. aureus mastitis relies on antibiotic treatment of intramammary infections at drying-off and treatment of clinical and sub clinical mastitis during lactation.2

Beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, lincosamides, fluoro-quinolones and macrolides are common antimicrobial compounds for treatment of S. aureus mastitis by the intramammary or systemic administration route. Given high bioavailability from the injection site, lipid solubility, long half-life, low protein binding and intracellular concentration in phagocytes, macrolides are of considerable interest for parenteral mastitis therapy.1 Tylosin and tilmicosin are routinely used for dry cow therapy in most of dairy farms in Iran.

Macrolide resistance in Staphylococcus species occurs by three primary mechanisms: Through target-site modification, through efflux of the antibiotics, and by drug inactivation. Target modification is pre-dominant mechanism that is dependent on the erm genes.3 Because of extraordinary usage of macrolides for treatment of S. aureus mastitis in Iranian dairy farms for a long time, it is not surprising that resistance is prevalent among Staphylococcus species. In this study, we determined the prevalence of both phenotypic and genotypic tylosin resistance in S. aureus isolates from bovine subclinical mastitis.

 

Materials and methods

 

Bacterial isolates. The present study was performed in nine dairy farms belonging to three different province of Iran including Tehran (three farms, n = 33), Khorasan Razavi (three farms, n = 40) and Alborz (three farms, n = 30) from 2014 to 2015. The California mastitis test (CMT) was done and milk samples were taken from quarters with score 1 or more in CMT and cultured. A total number of 103 bovine S. aureus isolates from more than 500 individual quarter milk with subclinical mastitis were collected. Collection of milk samples and microbiological procedures were performed according to the National Mastitis Council procedures.4 Isolation and identification of these presumptive S. aureus colonies were based on conventional methods, including Gram staining, colony morphology, production of coagulase, catalase, DNase and fermentation of mannitol. To confirm the identity of the isolate as S. aureus, the nucA gene was amplified by a PCR-based method using primers listed in Table 1. The confirmed S. aureus isolates were stored at –70 ˚C in brain heart broth plus 20% glycerol.

DNA isolation and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. For detecting macrolide resistance genes, the whole genomic DNA from cultured strains was prepared using DNA extraction kit (GeneAll, Seoul, South Korea). The PCR was carried out on the three related genes, including ermA, ermB, ermC, using specific oligonucleotide primers listed in Table1. Amplification was performed in a final volume of 25 mL containing 10 μL of Taq DNA polymerase 2x master mix red containing; 2 mM MgCl2, Tris-HCl, (NH4)2S04, 0.20% Tween 20, 0.40 mM dNTPs, 0.20 units per μL ampliqon Taq DNA polymerase inert red dye and stabilizer (Ampliqon, Odense, Denmark), 0.50 mg mL-1 of each primer and 3µL of template DNA. The PCR conditions consisted of a pre-denaturation step at 94 ˚C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles of 45 sec at 94 ˚C, 50 sec at 50 ˚C (for ermA and ermC genes) or 54 ˚C (for ermB gene) or 55 ˚C (for nucA) and 75 sec at 72 ˚C. A final extension step was performed at 72 ˚C for 5 min. After amplification, DNA bands were analyzed by staining with ethidium bromide and electrophoresis (Bio-Rad, California, USA) on 1% agarose gel.

Antibiotic susceptibility testing. The broth micro-dilution method was used to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC), in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI).5 Mueller-Hinton broth was used as the test medium. Plates were incubated at 35 ˚C for 18 hr. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC29213 was used as reference strain for MIC quality controls. MIC were tested in the concentration range of 0.125 to 128.00 µg mL-1. Tylosin breakpoint 20 µg mL-1 was also considered in our test. 6

Statistical analysis. SPSS software (version 16.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA), was used for statistical analysis. Differences in the prevalence of macrolides resistant genes and distribution of MIC values in different provinces were calculated using the chi-square test. A p-value of 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

 

Table 1. The oligonucleotide primers and the size of amplified product used in this study.

Gene

Primers (5'–3')

Size (bp)

Reference

nucA

F- CTGGCATATGTATGGCAATTGTT

613

7

R-TATTGACCTGAATCAGCGTTGTCT

ermA

F-TATCTTATCGTTGAGAAGGGATT

139

8

R-CTACACTTGGCTGATGAAA

ermB

F-CTATCTGATTGTTGAAGAAGCATT

141

8

R-GTTTACTCTTGGTTTAGGATCAAA

ermC

F-AATCGTCAATTCCTGCATGT

299

9

R-TAATCGTGGAATACGGGTTTG

 

Results

 

The prevalence of S. aureus in milk samples obtained from cows with subclinical mastitis were 22.00%, 23.50% and 25.00% in Tehran, Khorasan Razavi and Alborz, respectively. Among 103 S. aureus isolates 58 (56.86%) and 31 (30.09%) isolates were resistant and inter-mediately resistant to tylosin, respectively. The MIC values ranges for the all strains were from 0.50 to 128.00 µg mL-1. The MIC90 values in our test were 64.00 µg mL-1, while the MIC50 values were 32.00 µg mL-1. The distribution of MIC values in different provinces showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). The MIC distribution data of tylosin for the 103 S. aureus isolates and macrolide resistant genes are summarized in Table 2. The PCR analysis of macrolides resistant genes revealed that 8(7.80%), 33(32.00%) and 21(20.40%) isolates harboured the ermA, ermB and ermC genes, respectively (Figs. 1 and 2).

 

Table 2. Comparison of macrolides resistant genes, tylosin resistant rates (%) and MIC (µg mL-1) distributions of S. aureus isolates.

Province

No.

Number (%)

Number of isolates inhibited by MIC

MIC50

MIC90

Range

Resistant isolates

ermA

ermB

ermC

0.125

0.25

0.5

1

2

4

8

16

32

64

≥128

Tehran

33

1(3.03)a

1(3.03)a

7(21.21)a

0

0

3

0

0

1

2

5

16

5

1

32

64

0.50 - 128

66.67

Khorasan Razavi

40

6(15.00)a

21(52.50)b

13(32.50)b

0

0

0

0

1

2

6

12

9

7

3

16

64

2 - 128

47.50

Alborz

30

1(3.33)a

11 (36.67)b

1(3.33)a

0

0

4

0

1

2

2

4

9

4

4

32

≥128

0.50 - 128

56.67

Total

103

8(7.80)

33(32.00)

21(20.40)

0

0

7

0

2

5

10

21

34

16

8

32

64

0.50 - 128

56.86

The MIC breakpoint for tylosin (≥ 20 µg mL-1) was based on the veterinary antimicrobial decision support (VADS); MICs indicating susceptibility are exhibited on a white background, those indicating intermediate resistance on a light grey background, and those indicating resistance on a dark grey background.

ab Values with different superscripts in the same column are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).

 

Fig. 1. Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products of ermA and ermC. Lane 1: is 100 bp DNA ladder; Lane 2: Positive control, ermA (139 bp), ermC (299 bp); Lane 3: Negative control; Lane 4 to 13: samples.

 

Fig. 2. Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products of ermB. Lane 1: is 100-bp DNA ladder; Lane 2: Positive control, ermB (141bp; Lane 3: Negative control; Lane 4 to 13: samples.

 

Fifty-six isolates (54.36%) of 103 had at least one erm gene. The most dominant resistant gene in Tehran was ermC and in other provinces was ermB. Between provinces, ermB and ermC have significant difference (p < 0.05). Among 58 tylosin resistant S. aureus, ermB gene was dominant and 27.60% of isolates harboured this gene (Table 3).

 

Table 3. Distribution of erm genes in isolates

Genotype

Tylosin resistant isolates

(n = 58)

Tylosin intermediate isolates

(n = 31)

Tylosin sensitive isolates

(n = 14)

ermA+B-C-

1 (1.70%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

ermA-B+C-

9 (15.50%)

9 (29.00%)

5 (35.70%)

ermA-B-C+

5 (8.60%)

3 (9.70%)

0 (0.00%)

ermA+B+C-

1 (1.70%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

ermA+B-C+

4 (6.90%)

0 (0.00%)

0 (0.00%)

ermA-B+C+

6 (10.30%)

1 (3.20%)

0 (0.00%)

ermA+B+C+

1 (1.70%)

1 (3.20%)

0 (0.00%)

ermA-B-C-

31 (53.40%)

17 (54.80%)

9 (64.30%)

 

 

Discussion

 

We have determined the prevalence of macrolides resistant genes and the distribution of tylosin MICs in S. aureus isolates from subclinical mastitis. The prevalence of S. aureus isolated obtained from subclinical mastitis was 23.00%. This prevalence varies in different countries. Prevalence of S. aureus in China is reported to be as high as 25.20%,10 others reported a prevalence of 10.20% and 30.60% in Finland and Kenya, respectively.11,12 The same prevalence rate (25.00%) was found among nine farms in Alborz, Iran.13

In the present study, frequency of acquired resistance to tylosin in S. aureus was high (56.86%). These results were completely in agreement with other investigation who reported 56% resistance in S. aureus isolated from cow milk samples with clinical and subclinical mastitis in Romania.14 Other studies from different geographical locations reported lower resistance to tylosin ranged from 4.40% to 40.30%.1,10,15

Pourtaghi et al. determined antimicrobial resistance patterns of S. aureus isolated from bovine subclinical mastitis in Alborz province and showed that resistance to tylosin was 28.80% of isolates.13

Furthermore, the MIC50 value of tylosin for S. aureus isolates in our study was higher than those measured by previous investigators.1,10,14 The overall resistance of S. aureus isolated from bovine mastitis to macrolides in different countries is low or scarce.16,17 Result of present study showed higher frequency of resistance to macrolides. High resistance of S. aureus isolates to tylosin might be associated with the increase in highly resistant strains and rapid transfer of cloned resistance which could result from introducing and extraordinary usage of macrolides in Iranian dairy farms. When a single resistance determinant was considered, ermB was the most common. These observations are contrary to most other findings especially in human research that reported ermA was more frequent genes and ermB was present in only a minority of strains.18,19,20 Others showed that ermC was the most frequently encountered gene responsible for macrolide resistance among S.aureus isolates.3 Interestingly, in our investigation most of tylosin resistant isolates did not harbour any erm gene. It seems that other resistant genes are more important in tylosin resistance isolates obtained from bovine mastitis. Other resistant genes like ermF, ermY and lunA have also been detected in S. aureus isolates that were macrolide-lincosamides and streptogramin resistant.3,21 Also, it may suggest that one or several new resistance mechanisms for macrolides may be widespread among S. aureus isolates.

In conclusion, tylosin resistance was prevalent in S. aureus isolates obtained from bovine mastitis in Iran. The most frequent determinant of macrolides resistance was ermB and with ermC the next most common.

 

Acknowledgments

 

This work was supported by Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (Grant number 2/27031, 1392/3/18). The authors would like to thank Mr. Ali Kargar for assisting in laboratory measurements.

 

  1.  

    1. Bonnier M, Dore C, Amedeo J, et al. In vitro activity of tylosin and tilmicosin against cocci isolated from bovine mastitis. Rev Med Vet 2006; 157(10): 486-489.
    2. Bradley AJ. Bovine mastitis: An evolving disease. Vet J 2002; 164(2): 116-128.
    3. Vallianou N, Evangelopoulos A, Hadjisoteriou M, et al. Prevalence of macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin resistance among staphylococci in a tertiary care hospital in Athens, Greece. J Chemother 2015; 27(6): 319-323.
    4. National Mastitis Council (NMC). In: Laboratory handbook on bovine mastitis. Madison, USA 2005;
      1-50.
    5. Jorgensen JH, Turnidge JD. Susceptibility test methods: Dilution and disk diffusion methods. Manual of clinical microbiology. 11th ed. Washington, USA: American society of microbiology 2015; 1253-1273.
    6. Li L, Feng W, Zhang Z, et al. Macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin resistance phenotypes and genotypes of coagulase-positive Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococcal isolates from bovine mastitis. BMC Vet Res 2015; 11(1): 168.
    7. Sahebekhtiari N, Nochi Z, Eslampour MA, et al. Characterization of Staphylococcusaureus strains isolated from raw milk of bovine subclinical mastitis in Tehran and Mashhad. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung 2011;58: 113-121.
    8. Martineau F, Picard FJ, Lansac N, et al. Correlation between the resistance genotype determined by multiplex PCR assays and the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000; 44(2): 231-238.
    9. Strommenger B, Kettlitz C, Werner G, et al. Multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detection of nine clinically relevant antibiotic resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41(9): 4089-4094.
    10. Wang Y, Wu CM, Lu LM, et al. Macrolide–lincosamide-resistant phenotypes and genotypes of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine clinical mastitis. Vet Microbiol 2008;130(1): 118-125.
    11. Pitkälä A, Haveri M, Pyörälä S, et al. Bovine mastitis in Finland 2001-prevalence, distribution of bacteria, and antimicrobial resistance. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87(8):2433-2441.
    12. Shitandi A, Sternesjö A. Prevalence of multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus in milk from large-and small-scale producers in Kenya. J Dairy Sci 2004; 87(12): 4145-4149.
    13. Pourtaghi H, Azizi AG, Sodagari H. Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine subclinical mastitis in Alborz province, Iran. Bulg J Vet Med 2016; 19(2):169-174.
    14. Brînda M, Herman V, Faur B. Antimicrobial sensitivity of some Staphylococcus aureus strains from bovine mastitis. Lucrări Ştiinţifice Medicină Veterinară. 2010; 43(1): 102-105.
    15. Malinowski E, Klossowska A, Kaczmarowski M, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of staphylococci isolated from affected with mastitis cows. B Vet Ins Pulawy 2002; 46(2): 289-294.
    16. De Oliveira A, Watts J, Salmon S, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in Europe and the United States. J Dairy Sci 2000; 83(4): 855-862.
    17. Gentilini E, Denamiel G, Llorente P, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from bovine mastitis in Argentina. J Dairy Sci 2000; 83(6): 1224-1227.
    18. Lim JA, Kwon AR, Kim SK, et al. Prevalence of resistance to macrolide, lincosamide and streptogram in antibiotics in Gram-positive cocci isolated in a Korean hospital. J Antimicrob Chemoth 2002; 49(3): 489-495.
    19. Lina G, Quaglia A, Reverdy ME, et al. Distribution of genes encoding resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramins among staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999; 43(5): 1062-1066.
    20. Kim HB, Lee B, Jang HC, et al. A high frequency of macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin resistance determinants in Staphylococcus aureus isolated in South Korea. Microb Drug Resist 2004; 10(3): 248-254.
    21. Loeza-Lara PD, Soto-Huipe M, Baizabal-Aguirre VM, et al. pBMSa1, a plasmid from a dairy cow isolate of Staphylococcus aureus, encodes a lincomycin resistance determinant and replicates by the rolling-circle mechanism. Plasmid 2004; 52(1): 48-56.