<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Veterinary Research Forum</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2008-8140</Issn>
				<Volume>11</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2020</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>15</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Chemical composition, antioxidative‎, antibacterial‎‎, and time-kill activities of ‎some selected plant essential oils against foodborne pathogenic and spoilage ‎organisms</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>339</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>346</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">45628</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.30466/vrf.2018.91902.2223</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Maryam</FirstName>
					<LastName>Torabian Kakhki</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Food Hygiene and Aquaculture, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Naser</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sedaghat</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Food Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mohsenzadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Food Hygiene and Aquaculture, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-7829-039X</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2018</Year>
					<Month>08</Month>
					<Day>13</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Essential oils (EOs) have been utilized as a growth inhibitor of microorganisms. This study was aimed to recognize the composition, antioxidative‎, antibacterial‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎, and time-kill activities of &lt;em&gt;Origanum vulgare&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Zataria multiflora&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Syzygium aromaticum&lt;/em&gt;; and &lt;em&gt;Cinnamomum verum&lt;/em&gt; EOs against &lt;em&gt;Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli &lt;/em&gt;O157:H7,&lt;em&gt; Shewanella&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;putrefaciens&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Pseudomonas fluorescens&lt;/em&gt;. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used to determine the chemical composition of EOs. Disc diffusion, minimum inhibitory concentration, minimum bactericidal concentration, and time-kill methods were used to determine the antibacterial ‎‎activity of EOs. The antioxidative ‎ activity of EOs were determined by 2, 20-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging and ferric reducing antioxidative ‎ power methods. All EOs exhibited antibacterial ‎‎activity, however, &lt;em&gt;Z. multiflora&lt;/em&gt; EO was the most effective followed by&lt;em&gt; O. vulgare &lt;/em&gt;EO&lt;em&gt;.&lt;/em&gt; The lowest antibacterial‎‎‎‎‎ activity was observed in &lt;em&gt;C. verum&lt;/em&gt; EO. The most sensitive among tested bacteria to &lt;em&gt;Z. multiflora &lt;/em&gt;and &lt;em&gt;O. vulgare &lt;/em&gt;EOs was &lt;em&gt;E. coli &lt;/em&gt;O157:H7 and to &lt;em&gt;S. aromaticum&lt;/em&gt;; and &lt;em&gt;C. verum&lt;/em&gt; EOs were &lt;em&gt;S. putrefaciens&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;P. fluorescens&lt;/em&gt;, respectively&lt;em&gt;.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;Z. multiflora &lt;/em&gt;and &lt;em&gt;O. vulgare &lt;/em&gt;EOs were able to kill 85.00% and 80.00% of the &lt;em&gt;E. coli &lt;/em&gt;O157: H7 and &lt;em&gt;S.&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;putrefaciens &lt;/em&gt;cells in 4 hr, respectively. The highest antioxidative ‎activity was observed in &lt;em&gt;Z. multiflora&lt;/em&gt; EO. The tested EOs showed the highest antioxidative ‎activity at a concentration of 2.00 g L&lt;sup&gt;-1&lt;/sup&gt;. Ferric reducing antioxidant power value of &lt;em&gt;Z. multiflora, O. vulgare&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;S. aromaticum&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;C. verum&lt;/em&gt; was 2.01 ± 0.03, 1.47 ± 0.04, 1.01 ± 0.03, and 0.66 ± 0.34, respectively. High concentrations of tested EOs showed a decrease in antioxidative ‎ activity.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Antibacterial‎‎ activity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">‎ Antioxidative ‎ assay</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">‎ Essential oil</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">‎ Minimum bactericidal concentration</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">‎ Minimum inhibitory concentration</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://vrf.iranjournals.ir/article_45628_e7f30b2ee908f3fc9719f2138c74e22d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
