Goat paratuberculosis in Shiraz: Histopathological and molecular approaches

Document Type: Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

2 DVM Graduate, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

In the present study, Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) was investigated in goats slaughtered in Shiraz abattoir using histopathological examinations and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Ilium and mesenteric lymph node samples from 66 suspected goat carcasses to Johne’s disease were collected. Among 66 examined slaughtered goats, nine (13.63%) goats were positive for MAP in both histopathological and PCR examinations. Eight goats were positive in PCR method while no lesion related to Johne’s disease was observed in their histopathological sections. All positive goats in histopathological examination were also positive in PCR. Based on the results of PCR, the detection rate of MAP in Shiraz abattoir was 25.80% (17 goats). According to the present findings, although both histopathological and PCR methods are appropriate for detecting Johne’s disease, PCR is more sensitive than histopathological examination.

Keywords

Main Subjects


 

  1. Haghkhah M, Ansari-Lari M, Novin-Baheran A, et al. Herd-level prevalence of Mycobacterium avium paratuberculosis by bulk-tank milk PCR in Fars province (southern Iran) dairy herds. Prev Vet Med 2008; 86:8-13.
  2. Sechi LA, Dow CT. Mycobacterium avium ss. paratuberculosis zoonosis – The hundred year war – beyond Crohn’s disease. Front Immunol 2015; 6:1-8.
  3. Pithua P, Kollias NS. Estimated prevalence of caprine paratuberculosis in boer goat herds in Missouri, USA. Vet Med Int 2012; 674085. doi:10.1155/2012/ 674085.
  4. Fawzy A, Prince A, Hassan AA, et al. Epidemiological studies on Johne’s disease in ruminants and Crohn’s disease in humans in Egypt. Int J Vet Sci Med 2013; 1:79-86.
  5. Erume J, Spergser J, Rosengarten R. Rapid detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis from cattle and zoo animals by nested PCR. Afr Health Sci 2001; 1(2):83-89.
  6. Tiwari A, VanLeeuwen JA, McKenna SLB, et al. Johne’s disease in Canada Part I: Clinical symptoms, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and prevalence in dairy herds. Can Vet J 2006; 47(9):874-882.
  7. Stabel JR. Johne’s disease: a hidden threat. J Dairy Sci 1998; 81:283-288.
  8. Whitlock RH, Wells SJ, Sweeney RW, et al. ELISA and fecal culture for paratuberculosis (Johne’s disease): Sensitivity and specificity of each method. Vet Microbiol 2000; 77:387-398.
  9. Behr MA, Collins DM. Paratuberculosis organism, disease, control. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing 2010;169-179.
  10. Delgado F, Aguilar D, Garbaccio S, et al. Detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis by a direct in situ PCR method. Vet Med Int 2011; 2011: 267102. doi: 10.4061/2011/267102.
  11. Slana I, Kralik P, Kralova A, et al. On-farm spread of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in raw milk studied by IS900 and F57 competitive real time quantitative PCR and culture examination. Int J Food Microbiol 2008; 128:250-257.
  12. Green EP, Tizard ML, Moss MT, et al. Sequence and characteristics of IS900, an insertion element identified in human Crohne’s disease isolate of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis. Nucleic Acids Res 1989;
    17:9063-9073.
  13. Bull TJ, Hermon-Taylor J, Pavlik I, et al. Characterization of IS900 loci in Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis and development of multiplex PCR typing. Microbiol 2000; 146:2185-2197.
  14. Bancroft JD, Stevens A. Theory and practice of histological techniques. London, UK: Churchill Livingston1990; 21-119.
  15. Prophet EB, Mills B, Arrington JB, Sobin LH. Laboratory methods in histotechnology. Washington DC, USA: American Registry of Pathology 1994; 219-222.
  16. Sambrook J, Russell RW. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. 3rd ed. New York, USA: Cold spring harbor laboratory press 2001;47-53.
  17. Corti S, Stephan R. Detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis specific IS900 insertion sequences in bulk-tank milk samples obtained from different regions throughout Switzerland. BMC Microbiol 2002; 2(1): 15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-2-15.
  18. Haji Hajikolaei MR, Ghorbanpoor M, Solaymani M. The prevalence of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infection in ileocecal valve of cattle slaughtered in Ahvaz abattoir, southern Iran. Iran J Vet Res2006; 7:2-15.
  19. Djonnea B, Jensena MR, Grantb IR, et al. Detection by immunomagnetic PCR of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis in milk from dairy goats in Norway. Vet Microbiol 2002; 92:135-143.
  20. Kruze J, Salgado M, Paredes E, et al. Goat paratuberculosis in Chile: First isolation and confirmation of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection in a dairy goat. J Vet Diagn Invest 2006; 18:476-479.
  21. Corpa JM, Garrido J, García- Marín JF, e al. Classification of lesions observed in natural cases of paratuberculosis in goats. J Comp Pathol 2000; 122:55-65.
  22. Kheirandish R, Khodakaram Tafti A, Hosseini A. Classification of lesions and comparison of immunohistochemical and acid fast staining in diagnosis of naturally occurring paratuberculosis in goats. Small Ruminant Res 2009; 87:81-85.