Veterinary Research Forum
Vet Res Forum

Effects of intensified or conventional milk feeding on pre-weaning health ‎and feeding behavior of Holstein female calves around weaning

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Masoud Alimirzaei 1
Younes Ali Alijoo 1
Mehdi Dehghan Banadaky 2
Mehdi Eslamizad 2

1 Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

2 Department of Animal Sciences, Campus of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

https://doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2018.88679.2149
Abstract
Health, inflammatory, and stress indices as well as feeding behavior around weaning were measured for Holstein female calves fed intensified milk or conventionally during the pre-weaning period. Calves (n ꞊ 48) were randomly assigned to one of two experimental treatments including a conventional (CF) or an intensified feeding (IF) groups. In CF group, calves (n ꞊ 24) received 0.52 kg of dry matter (DM) per day from pasteurized whole milk (23.00% crude protein (CP) and 27.00% fat) until day 50 of age. In IF group, calves (n= 24) fed 0.97 kg of DM per day on average for the first three weeks, and then, milk allowance decreased gradually to reach 0.52 kg DM per day and continued until day 50. All calves were gradually weaned from day 51 to 56. Blood samples were taken on days 14, 28, and 57 at 06:30 AM for serum amyloid A (SAA), cortisol, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and iron analyses. Conventionally fed calves had more days with fever during the pre-weaning period. Blood SAA and cortisol levels were higher in CF calves on day 14. However, SAA levels were higher for IF calves on day 57. Intensified milk-fed calves spent more time for standing than CF calves. A trend to be significant was observed for non-nutritive oral behavior in IF calves. In summary, dairy calf health can be improved by intensified milk feeding during the pre-weaning period; however, this method has the potential to reduce calves welfare around weaning transition.

Keywords

Animal welfare
‎ Feeding behavior
‎ Female calf ‎
  1. USDA. 2010. Dairy 2007, Heifer Calf Health and Management Practices on U.S. Dairy Operations, 2007 USDA:APHIS:VS, CEAH. Fort Collins, CO #550.01102.
  2. Curtis CR, White ME, Erb HN. Effects of calfhood morbidity on long-term survival in New York Holstein herds. Prev Vet Med 1989;7(3):173-186.
  3. von Keyserlingk MAG, Rushen J, de Passillé AM, et al. Invited review: The welfare of dairy cattle-Key concepts and the role of science. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92(9):4101-4111.
  4. Yun CH, Wynn P, Ha JK. Stress, acute phase proteins and immune modulation in calves. Anim Prod Sci 2014;54:1561-1568.
  5. de Passillé AM. Sucking motivation and related problems in calves. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2001; 72(3):175-187.
  6. Kertz AF, Prewitt LR, Everett JP, Jr. An early weaning calf program: Summarization and review. J Dairy Sci 1979;62(11):1835-1843.
  7. Jasper J, Weary DM. Effects of ad libitum milk intake on dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 2002;85(11):3054-3058.
  8. Khan MA, Lee HJ, Lee WS, et al. Pre- and postweaning performance of Holstein female calves fed milk through step-down and conventional methods. J Dairy Sci 2007;90(2):876-885.
  9. Soberon F, Raffrenato E, Everett RW, et al. ME. Preweaning milk replacer intake and effects on long-term productivity of dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 2012;95(2):783-793.
  10. Hammon HM, Schiessler G, Nussbaum A, et al. Feed intake patterns, growth performance, and metabolic and endocrine traits in calves fed unlimited amounts of colostrum and milk by automate, starting in the neonatal period. J Dairy Sci 2002;85(12):3352-3362.
  11. Rushen J, de Passillé AM. The motivation of non-nutritive sucking in calves, Bos taurus. Anim Behav 1995;49:1503-1510.
  12. Drackley JK. Calf nutrition from birth to breeding. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 2008;24(1):55-86.
  13. Hill TM, Bateman 2nd HG, , Aldrich JM, et al. Effect of milk replacer program on digestion of nutrients in dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 2010;93(3):1105-1115.
  14. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official methods of analysis 15th ed. Arlington, USA: AOAC 1990.
  15. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991;74(10):3583-3597.
  16. Larson LL, Owen FG, Albright JL, et al. Guidelines toward more uniformity in measuring and reporting calf experimental data J Dairy Sci 1977;60:989-991.
  17. Castells LI, Bach A, Araujo G, et al. Effect of different forage sources on performance and feeding behavior of Holstein calves. J Dairy Sci 2012;95(1):286-293.
  18. Alimirzaei M. Investigating different patterns of nutrition during pre and post-weaning period on inflammatory response, fecal bacterial count, growth performance and feeding behavior of Holstein female calves. PhD Thesis. 2016; Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
  19. Quigley JD, Wolfe TA, Elsasser TH. Effects of additional milk replacer feeding on calf health, growth, and selected blood metabolites in calves. J Dairy Sci 2006;89(1):207-216.
  20. Khan MA, Weary DM, von Keyserlingk MAG. Invited review: effects of milk ration on solid feed intake, weaning, and performance in dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci 2011;94(3):1071-1081.
  21. Godden SM, Fetrow JP, Feirtag JM, et al. Economic analysis of feeding pasteurized nonsaleable milk versus conventional milk replacer to dairy calves. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005;226(9):1547-1554.
  22. de Passillé AM, Rabeyrin M, Rushen J. Associations between milk intake and activity in the first days of a calf's life and later growth and health. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2016;175:2-7.
  23. Pedersen LH, Aalbaek B, Røntved CM, et al. Early pathogenesis and inflammatory response in experimental bovine mastitis due to Streptococcus uberis. J Comp Pathol 2003;128(2-3):156-164.
  24. Tóthová C, Nagy O, Seidel H, et al. Acute phase proteins in relation to various inflammatory diseases of calves. Comp Clin Pathol 2012;21:1037-1042.
  25. Schäff CT, Gruse J, Maciej J, et al. Effects of feeding milk replacer Ad Libitum or in restricted amounts for the first five weeks of life on the growth, metabolic adaptation, and immune status of newborn calves. PLOS ONE 2016;11(12):e0168974. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0168974.
  26. Griebel PJ, Schoonderwoerd M, Babiuk LA. Ontogeny of the immune response: effect of protein energy malnutrition in neonatal calves. Can J Vet Res 1987; 51(4):428-435.
  27. Kabu M, Elitok B, Kucukkurt I. Detection of serum amyloid-A concentration in the calf clinically diagnosed with pneumonia, enteritis and pneumoenteritis. Cienc Rural 2016;46(2):293-299.
  28. Huebers HA, Finch CA. The physiology of transferrin and transferrin receptors. Physiol Rev 1987;67(2):520-582.
  29. Tothova C, Nagy O, Kovac. Acute phase proteins and their use in the diagnosis of diseases in ruminants: a review. Vet Med (Praha) 2014;59(4):163-180.
  30. Ballou MA, Cruz GD, Pittroff W, et al. Modifying the acute phase response of Jersey calves by supplementing milk replacer with omega-3 fatty acids from fish oil. J Dairy Sci 2008;91(9):3478-3487.
  31. Hibbs J, Conrad HR, Vandersall JH, et al. Occurrence of iron deficiency anemia in dairy calves at birth and its alleviation by iron dextran injection. J Dairy Sci 1963;46:1118-1124.
  32. Chua B, Coenen E, van Delen J, et al. Effects of pair versus individual housing on behavior and performance of dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 2002;85(2):360-364.
  33. Camiloti TV, Fregonesi JA, von Keyserlingk MA, et al. Short communication: Effects of bedding quality on the lying behavior of dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 2012; 95(6):3380-3383.
  34. Rechtschaffen A. Current perspectives on the function of sleep. Perspect Biol Med 1998;41(3):359-390.
  35. Siegel JM. Clues to the functions of mammalian sleep. Nature 2005;437(7063):1264-1271.
  36. Nielsen PP, Jensen MB, Lidfors L. Milk allowance and weaning method affect the use of a computer controlled milk feeder and the development of cross-sucking in dairy calves. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2008;109(2-4):223-237.
  37. Miller-Cushon EK, Bergeron R, Leslie KE, et al. Effect of milk feeding level on development of feeding behavior in dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 2013;96(1):551-564.
  38. Baldwin RLV, McLeod KR, Klotz JL, et al. Rumen development, intestinal growth and hepatic metabolism in the pre- and postweaning ruminant. J Dairy Sci 2004;87. doi:10.3168/JDS.S0022-0302(04) 70061-2.
  39. Swanson EW, Harris Jr JD. Development of rumination in the young calf. J Dairy Sci 1958;41:1768-1776.
  40. Leruste H, Brscic M, Cozzi G, et al. Prevalence and potential influencing factors of non-nutritive oral behaviors of veal calves on commercial farms. J Dairy Sci 2014;97(11):7021-7030.
  41. Miller-Cushon EK, Bergeron R, Leslie KE, et al. Effect of early exposure to different feed presentations on feed sorting of dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 2013; 96: 4624-4633.
  42. Borderas TF, de Passillé AMB, Rushen J. Feeding behavior of calves fed small or large amounts of milk. J Dairy Sci 2009;92(6):2843-2852.
  43. Hulbert LE, Moisá SJ. Stress, immunity, and the management of calves. J Dairy Sci 2016;99(4):3199-3216.
  44. De Paula Vieira A, Guesdon V, de Passillé AM, et al. Behavioral indicators of hunger in dairy calves. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2008;109(2-4):180-189.
  45. Terré M, Devant M, Bach A. Effect of level of milk replacer fed to Holstein calves on performance during the preweaning period and pellet digestibility at weaning. Livest Sci 2007;110(1):82-88.
Veterinary Research Forum
Volume 11, Issue 4
Autumn 2020
Pages 311-318

  • Receive Date 27 June 2018
  • Revise Date 27 August 2018
  • Accept Date 25 September 2018

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us