Proteomic profiling of pseudorabies virus-infected PK-15 cells based on 4D label free analysis

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Animal Science, Wenzhou Vocational College of Science and Technology, Wenzhou, China

2 Department of Science, College of Science, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China

Abstract
Pseudorabies virus (PRV) heavily depends on host machinery to support its life cycle. Investigating the interaction between PRV and host could aid in the understandings of viral pathogenesis. In this study, we performed a 4D label free proteomic method to examine the differentially expressed proteins in porcine kidney PK-15 cells with PRV infection. The results showed that the levels of 661 proteins were significantly elevated and 693 proteins were markedly reduced. Furthermore, these altered proteins were primarily enriched in spliceosome, protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum (ER), RNA transport, and protein export. To ensure the reliability of the proteomic results, the protein levels of formin binding protein 11 and wolfram syndrome 1as components of spliceosome and ER were verified via western blotting and the results were consistent. Together, our data shed light on a new protein profiling induced by PRV infection and highlighted the importance of spliceosome and ER in PRV replication which could promote understandings of host-PRV interplay.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. Pomeranz LE, Reynolds AE, Hengartner CJ. Molecular biology of pseudorabies virus: impact on neurovirology and veterinary medicine. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2005; 69(3): 462-500.
  2. Ai JW, Weng SS, Cheng Q, et al. Human endophthalmitis caused by pseudorabies virus infection, China, 2017. Emerg Infect Dis 2018; 24(6): 1087-1090.
  3. Xu JJ, Gao F, Wu JQ, et al. Characterization of nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of pseudorabies virus protein UL46. Front Vet Sci 2020; 7: 484. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00484.
  4. Tan L, Yao J, Yang Y, et al. Current status and challenge of pseudorabies virus infection in China. Virol Sin 2021; 36(4): 588-607.
  5. Long JS, Mistry B, Haslam SM, et al. Host and viral determinants of influenza A virus species specificity. Nat Rev Microbiol 2019; 17(2): 67-81.
  6. Lum KK, Cristea IM. Proteomic approaches to uncovering virus-host protein interactions during the progression of viral infection. Expert Rev Proteomics 2016; 13(3): 325-340.
  7. Strmiskova M, Desrochers GF, Shaw TA, et al. Chemical methods for probing virus-host proteomic interactions. ACS Infect Dis 2016; 2(11): 773-786.
  8. Hoffmann W, Lipińska AD, Bieńkowska-Szewczyk K. Functional analysis of a frontal miRNA cluster located in the large latency transcript of pseudorabies virus. Viruses 2022; 14(6): 1147. doi: 10.3390/v14061147.
  9. Liu H, Yang L, Shi Z, et al. Functional analysis of prv- miR-LLT11a encoded by pseudorabies virus. J Vet Sci 2019; 20(6): e68. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2019.20.e68.
  10. Yang X, Xu S, Chen D, et al. Proteomic analysis of Vero cells infected with pseudorabies virus. Viruses 2022; 14(4): 755. doi: 10.3390/v14040755.
  11. Jiang FF, Wang RQ, Guo CY, et al. Phospho-proteomics identifies a critical role of ATF2 in pseudorabies virus replication. Virol Sin 2022; 37(4): 591-600.
  12. Chen X, Wang S, Wu M, et al. Role of succinylation in pseudorabies virus infection. J Virol 2023; 97(4): e0179022. doi: 10.1128/jvi.01790-22.
  13. Bai Y, Li L, Shan T, et al. Proteasomal degradation of nonstructural protein 12 by RNF114 suppresses porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus replication. Vet Microbiol 2020; 246: 108746. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108746.
  14. Chen X, Shan T, Sun D, et al. Host Zinc-finger CCHC-type containing protein 3 inhibits pseudorabies virus proliferation by regulating type I interferon signaling. Gene 2022; 827: 146480. doi: 10.1016/j.gene. 2022.146480.
  15. Yang H, Beutler B, Zhang D. Emerging roles of spliceosome in cancer and immunity. Protein Cell 2022; 13(8): 559-579.
  16. De Maio FA, Risso G, Iglesias NG, et al. The dengue virus NS5 protein intrudes in the cellular spliceosome and modulates splicing. PLoS Pathog 2016; 12(8): e1005841. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005841.
  17. Schwarz DS, Blower MD. The endoplasmic reticulum: structure, function and response to cellular signaling. Cell Mol Life Sci 2015; 73(1): 79-94.
  18. He W, Li C, Dong L, Yang G, et al. Tandem mass tag-based quantitative proteomic analysis of ISG15 knockout PK15 cells in pseudorabies virus infection. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12(10): 1557. doi: 10.3390/ genes12101557.
  19. Mizutani K, Suetsugu S, Takenawa T. FBP11 regulates nuclear localization of N-WASP and inhibits N-WASP-dependent microspike formation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004; 313(3): 468-474.
  20. Kato Y, Miyakawa T, Kurita J, et al. Structure of FBP11 WW1-PL ligand complex reveals the mechanism of proline-rich ligand recognition by group II/III WW domains. J Biol Chem 2006; 281(52): 40321-40329.
  21. Rigoli L, Lombardo F, Di Bella C. Wolfram syndrome and WFS1 gene. Clin Genet 2011; 79(2): 103-117.
  22. Knox C, Luke GA, Blatch GL, et al. Heat shock protein 40 (Hsp40) plays a key role in the virus life cycle. Virus Res 2011; 160(1-2): 15-24.
  23. Nanda SK, Johnson RF, Liu Q, et al. Mitochondrial HSP70, HSP40, and HSP60 bind to the 3' untranslated region of the Murine hepatitis virus genome. Arch Virol 2004; 149(1): 93-111.
  24. Batra J, Tripathi S, Kumar A, et al. Human Heat shock protein 40 (Hsp40/DnaJB1) promotes influenza A virus replication by assisting nuclear import of viral ribonucleoproteins. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 19063. doi: 10.1038/srep19063.
Volume 16, Issue 3
March 2025
Pages 141-147

  • Receive Date 28 April 2024
  • Accept Date 29 June 2024