Veterinary Research Forum
Vet Res Forum

Comparing feed efficiency and egg production in Hy-Line W-80 and Iraqi indigenous chickens

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Dhafer Abdul-Malek Ali
Nihad Abdul-Lateef Ali
Mohammed Baqur Sahib Al-Shuhaib

Department of Animal Production, College of Agriculture, Al-Qasim Green University, Al-Qasim, Iraq

https://doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2024.2030349.4297
Abstract
The Iraqi indigenous chicken (IIC) is a native breed known for its remarkable ability to thrive in harsh environments. However, the primary challenge with this breed is its lower productivity levels especially when compared to commercial strains. This study evaluated the performance of 120 layers of IIC in comparison with an equal number of Hy-Line W-80 layers across multiple traits including feed efficiency (FE), feed conversion ratio (FCR), daily feed intake (DFI), egg mass (EM) and total egg number (EN) production. Over a period spanning four consecutive weeks intervals significant differences were observed between the two lines across all measured parameters. Hy-Line W-80 consistently exhibited superior FE, with values ranging from 0.49 to 0.54 compared to IIC values that ranged from 0.23 to 0.26. Similarly, Hy-Line W-80 demonstrated lower FCR values ranging from 1.85 to 2.03 contrasting with IIC (3.77 to 4.37). The DFI was notably higher in Hy-Line W-80 (ranging from 104.30 to 106.00 g per day) compared to IIC (73.75 to 90.20 g per day). Furthermore, Hy-Line W-80 consistently outperformed IIC in EM production with values ranging from 52.33 to 56.67 compared to IIC values (19.83 to 21.47). Another superiority of Hy-Line W-80 was observed by showing higher EN over IIC layers in all sixteen weeks of investigation. In conclusion, Hy-Line W-80 consistently outperformed IIC in various parameters such as FE, FCR, DFI, EM and EN production. Accordingly, these data could be exploited in selective breeding and genetic improvement strategies to enhance the productivity of IIC.

Keywords

Egg production
Feed efficiency
Hy-Line W-80
Iraqi Chickens
Performance

Subjects

  1. Walker S, Baum JI. Eggs as an affordable source of nutrients for adults and children living in food-insecure environments. Nutr Rev 2022; 80(2): 178-186.
  2. Ibrahim D, Goshu G. On-farm egg and meat production performance of commercial hybrids. Ethiop J Agric Sci 2020; 30(2): 119-133.
  3. Al-Soudi KA, Al-Jebouri MAJ. Production potential in subtropic climate of native Iraqi chicken compared to White Leghorn, New Hampshire and their cross. Worlds Poult Sci J 1979; 35(4): 227-235.
  4. Aljubouri TRS, Al-Shuhaib MBS. Genotyping of mitochondrial D-loop sequences in three breeds of sheep. Biologia 2020; 76(1): 203-211.
  5. Hussein TH, Al-Shuhaib MB, Al-Thuwaini TM. Potential mitochondrial diversity role in the productivity of three lines of Japanese quails. Biodiversitas 2020; 21(5): 2258-2265.
  6. Mustafa KM, Ewadh MJ, Al-Shuhaib MBS, et al. The in silico prediction of the chloroplast maturase K gene polymorphism in several barley varieties. Agriculture 2018; 64(1): 3-16.
  7. Hashim HO, Al-Shuhaib MBS, Ewadh MJ. Heterogeneity of proteins in bird’s egg-whites. Biotropia 2019; 26(2): 65-81.
  8. Ahmed AM, AlBakri HS. Phynotypic and genotypic identification of Eimeria species in backyard chicken in Nineveh governorate, Iraq. Iraqi J Vet Sci 2021; 35(Suppl I-III): 41-46.
  9. Al-Shuhaib MBS. A minimum requirements method to isolate large quantities of highly purified DNA from one drop of poultry blood. J Genet 2018; 97(4): e87-e94.
  10. Ali NAL, Al-Shuhaib MBS. Highly effective dietary inclusion of laurel (Laurus nobilis) leaves on productive traits of broiler chickens. Acta Sci Anim Sci 2021; 43: e52198. doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v43i1.52198
  11. Sunder J, Chatterjee RN, Rai RB, et al. Production performance of indigenous and crossbred poultry germplasm of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Indian J Anim Sci 2005; 75(11): 1326-1328.
  12. Al-Athari AK, Al-Rawi AA, Al-Khilani FM, et al. Performance of indigenous genetic lines of Iraqi chicken [Arabic]. IPA J Agric Res 2002;12: 53-67.
  13. Al-Rawi AA, Al-Athari AK. Characteristics of indigenous chicken in Iraq. Anim Genet Resour 2002; 32: 87-93.
  14. Asil U, Nasibov E. Sex detection in the early stage of fertilized chicken eggs via image recognition. IJCSIT 2023; 15(2): 19-26.
  15. Rizzi C. Yield performance, laying behaviour traits and egg quality of purebred and hybrid hens reared under outdoor conditions. Animals (Basel) 2020;10(4): 584. doi: 10.3390/ani10040584.
  16. Tawfeq EM, Al-Neemy MAS. Productive performance and qualitative egg characteristics of two local lines chickens and laying brown Lohmann. J Agric Environ Vet Sci 2022; 6(2): 109-116.
  17. Underwood G, Andrews D, Phung T. Advances in genetic selection and breeder practice improve commercial layer hen welfare. Anim Prod Sci 2021; 61(10): 856-866.
  18. Razuki WM, Al-Shaheen SA. Use of full diallel cross to estimate crossbreeding effects in laying chickens. Int J Poult Sci 2011; 10(3): 197-204.
  19. Dickson TM, Tactacan GB, Hebert K, et al. Optimization of folate deposition in eggs through dietary supplementation of folic acid over the entire production cycle of Hy-Line W36, Hy-Line W98, and CV20 laying hens. J Appl Poult Res 2010; 19(1): 80-91.
  20. Tadeo DB. Laying performance and hatchability rate of true-to-type Bolinao native chicken in ASIST Demo-Site Lagangilang, Abra, Philippines. Diversitas J 2024; 9(2): 933-948.
  21. Macer D. Ethical poultry and the bioethics of poultry production. J Poult Sci 2019; 56(2): 79-83.
  22. Buzała M, Janicki B, Czarnecki R. Consequences of different growth rates in broiler breeder and layer hens on embryogenesis, metabolism and metabolic rate: a review. Poult Sci 2015; 94(4): 728-733.
  23. Ghanem H, Elseady Y, Ibrahim S, et al. Comparison of productive performance, gene expression, metabolic biochemical profile and economic evaluation between some layer and broiler breeds. J Hellenic Vet Med Soc 2024; 75(1): 6973-6988.
  24. Bahuti M, Junior TY, Fassani ÉJ, et al. Evaluation of different light intensities on the well-being, productivity, and eggs quality of laying hens. Comput Electron Agric 2023; 215: 108423. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.108423.
  25. Gharagozloo A, Kheiri F, Nasr J, et al. Egg production, egg quality, blood lipids, and ovarian related indices in laying hens fed pomegranate by-products. J Hellenic Vet Med Soc 2023; 74(3): 6227-6232.
  26. Kaba S, Bozkurt Z. Comparison of hen performance and mortality of commercial layer flocks by strain and cage type. Kocatepe Vet J 2023; 16(4): 530-540.
  27. Marmelstein S, Costa IPA, Terra AV, et al. Advancing efficiency sustainability in poultry farms through data envelopment analysis in a Brazilian production system. Animals (Basel) 2024; 14(5): 726. doi: 10.3390/ ani14050726.
  28. Reyer H, Hawken R, Murani E, et al. The genetics of feed conversion efficiency traits in a commercial broiler line. Sci Rep 2015; 5(1): 16387. doi: 10.1038/srep16387.
  29. Pym RA, Nicholls PJ, Thomson E, et al. Energy and nitrogen metabolism of broilers selected over ten generations for increased growth rate, food consumption and conversion of food to gain. Br Poult Sci 1984; 25(4): 529-539.
  30. Cherry JA, Siegel PB. Selection for body weight at eight weeks of age: 15. Feed passage and intestinal size of normal and dwarf chicks. Poult Sci 1978; 57(2): 336-340.
  31. Robinson FE, Wilson JL, Yu MW, et al. The relationship between body weight and reproductive efficiency in meat-type chickens. Poult Sci 1993; 72(5): 912-922.
  32. Li YL, Xue FG, Xu SU, et al. Relationship between fat deposition and reproduction performance of Beijing-You chickens during the late stage of reproductive period. Acta Vet Zoot Sinica 2018; 49(6): 1163-1168.
  33. Akter Y, Greenhalgh S, Islam MR, et al. Hens ranked as highly feed efficient have an improved albumen quality profile and increased polyunsaturated fatty acids in the yolk. J Anim Sci 2018; 96(8): 3482-3490.
  34. Jacob JP, Wilson HR, Miles RD, et al. Factors affecting egg production in backyard chicken flocks. Available at: https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/publication/PS029. Accessed 22 Feb 2025.
  35. Janczak AM, Riber AB. Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens. Poult Sci 2015; 94(7): 1454-1469
  36. Sharp PJ. Broodiness and broody control. In: Hocking PM (Ed.). Biology of breeding poultry. Poult Sci Symp Ser Vol. 29. Wallingford, UK: CABI 2009; 181-205.
  37. Sarkar PK. Broodiness and broody hen management during egg incubation. Rev Agric Sci 2022; 10: 337-343.
  38. Sell-Kubiak E, Wimmers K, Reyer H, et al. Genetic aspects of feed efficiency and reduction of environmental footprint in broilers: a review. J Appl Genet 2017; 58(4): 487-498.
Veterinary Research Forum
Volume 16, Issue 4
April 2025
Pages 195-201

  • Receive Date 27 May 2024
  • Revise Date 30 June 2024
  • Accept Date 14 August 2024

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us