The effects of using a Rovabio® Plus multi-enzyme on production and incubation performance, blood parameters and duodenum morphology of broiler breeders at age of 45 - 60 weeks

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Department of Animal Science, Shabestar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shabestar, Iran

Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of using a Rovabio® Plus multi-enzyme on production and reproductive performance, duodenum morphology and biochemical parameters in 45 - 60 weeks old broiler breeders. For this purpose, 260 broiler breeders of Ross 308 strain were used in a completely randomized design with four treatments and five replications (13 hens and one rooster in each replication). Experimental treatments included: 1) Positive control diet (diet with standard energy and phosphorus and without multi-enzyme), 2) Negative control diet (diet in terms of energy 5.00% and phosphorus 50.00% less than the positive control diet, 3) Negative control diet with 1.00 g kg-1 Rovabio® Plus multi-enzyme and 4) Positive control diet with 1.00 g kg-1 Rovabio® Plus multi-enzyme. The results showed that negative control diet caused a significant decrease in the egg production percentage, egg weight, egg mass, settable eggs, fertile eggs, hatchability and one grade chickens, increased the feed conversion ratio and embryonic losses. Addition of 1.00 g kg-1 of multi-enzyme to negative control diet made the above parameters similar to the positive control treatment, however, the positive control treatment supplemented with multi-enzyme had a better performance compared to other treatments. This research showed that dietary supplementation of Rovabio® Plus multi-enzyme in broiler breeders at the age of 45 - 60 weeks led to the improvement of productive performance and incubation in negative control diet.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. Ross 308 parent stock: nutrition specifications. Available at: https://aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_PS/Ross_PS_PocketGuide_Production_2024-EN.pdf. Accessed March 16, 2025.
  2. King’Ori AM: Review of the factors that influence egg fertility and hatchability in poultry. Int J Poult Sci 2011; 10(6): 483-492.
  3. Gu YF, Chen YP, Jin R, et al. A comparison of intestinal integrity, digestive function, and egg quality in laying hens with different ages. Poult Sci 2021; 100(3): 100949. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.046.
  4. Bozkurt M, Çabuk M, Alçiçek A. Effect of dietary fat type on broiler breeder performance and hatching egg characteristics. J Appl Poult Res 2008; 17(1): 47-53.
  5. Liu Y, Zeng D, Qu L, et al. Multi-enzyme supplementation modifies the gut microbiome and metabolome in breeding hens. Front Microbiol 2021; 12: 711905. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.711905.
  6. Slominski BA, Boros D, Campbell LD et al. Wheat by-products in poultry nutrition. Part I. Chemical and nutritive composition of wheat screenings, bakery by-products and wheat mill run. Can J Anim Sci 2004; 84(3): 421-428.
  7. Knudsen KE. Fiber and nonstarch polysaccharide content and variation in common crops used in broiler diets. Poult Sci 2014; 93(9): 2380-2393.
  8. Bedford MR, Classen HL. Reduction of intestinal viscosity through manipulation of dietary rye and pentosanase concentration is effected through changes in the carbohydrate composition of the intestinal aqueous phase and results in improved growth rate and food conversion efficiency of broiler chicks. J Nutr 1992; 122(3): 560-569.
  9. Walk CL, Pirgozliev V, Juntunen K, et al. Evaluation of novel protease enzymes on growth performance and apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids in poultry: enzyme screening. Poult Sci 2018; 97(6): 2123-2138.
  10. Giacobbo FCN, Eyng C, Nunes RV, et al. Different enzymatic associations in diets of broiler chickens formulated with corn dried at various temperatures. Poult Sci 2021; 100(5): 101013. doi: 10.1016/ j.psj.2021.01.035.
  11. Monier MN. Efficacy of dietary exogenous enzyme supplementation on growth performance, antioxidant activity, and digestive enzymes of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) fry. Fish Physiol Biochem 2020; 46(2): 713-723.
  12. Ebrahim Nezhad Y, Maheri Sis N, Aghdam Shahryar H, et al. The effects of combination of citric acid and microbial phytase on the egg quality characteristics in laying hens. Asian J Anim Vet Adv 2008; 3(5): 293-297.
  13. Peng YL, Guo YM, Yuan JM. Effects of microbial phytase replacing partial inorganic phosphorus supplementation and xylanase on the growth performance and nutrient digestibility in broilers fed wheat-based diets. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2003; 16(2): 239-247.
  14. Costa FGP, Goulart CC, Figueiredo DF, et al. Economic and environmental impact of using exogenous enzymes on poultry feeding. Int J Poult Sci 2008; 7(4): 311-314.
  15. Khan SH, Sardar R, Siddique B. Influence of enzymes on performance of broilers fed sunflower-corn based diets. Pakistan Vet J 2006; 26(3): 109-114.
  16. Ghasemi-Sadabadi M, Ebrahimnezhad Y, Shaddel-Tili A, et al. The effects of fermented milk products (kefir and yogurt) and probiotic on performance, carcass characteristics, blood parameters, and gut microbial population in broiler chickens. Arch Anim Breed 2019; 62:361-374.
  17. Liu ZL, Chen Y, Xue JJ, et al. Effects of ambient temperature on the growth performance, fat deposition, and intestinal morphology of geese from 28 to 49 days of age. Poult Sci 2022; 101(5): 101814. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101814.
  18. Zhou D, Yang H, Zeng L, et al. Calculated inflammatory markers derived from complete blood count results, along with routine laboratory and clinical data, predict treatment failure of acute peritonitis in chronic peritoneal dialysis patients. Ren Fail 2023; 45(1): 2179856. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2179856.
  19. He X, Yu B, He J, et al. Effects of xylanase on growth performance, nutrients digestibility and intestinal health in weaned piglets. Livest Sci 2020; 233: 103940. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2020.103940
  20. Olukosi OA, González-Ortiz G, Whitfield H, et al. Comparative aspects of phytase and xylanase effects on performance, mineral digestibility, and ileal phytate degradation in broilers and turkeys. Poult Sci 2020; 99(3): 1528-1539.
  21. Moss AF, Khoddami A, Chrystal PV, et al. Starch digestibility and energy utilisation of maize-and wheat-based diets is superior to sorghum-based diets in broiler chickens offered diets supplemented with phytase and xylanase. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2020; 264: 114475. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114475.
  22. Smeets N, Nuyens F, Van Campenhout L, et al. Interactions between the concentration of non-starch polysaccharides in wheat and the addition of an enzyme mixture in a broiler digestibility and performance trial. Poult Sci 2018; 97(6): 2064-2070.
  23. Zheng L, Cho SH, Kang CW, et al. Effects of β-mannanase on egg production performance, egg quality, intestinal microbiota, viscosity, and ammonia concentration in laying hens. Braz J Poult Sci 2020; 22(01): 1180. doi: 10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1180
  24. Kim MC, Kim JH, Pitargue FM, et al. Effect of dietary β-mannanase on productive performance, egg quality, and utilization of dietary energy and nutrients in aged laying hens raised under hot climatic conditions. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2017; 30(10): 1450-1455.
  25. Lv JN, Chen YQ, Guo XJ, et al. Effects of supplementation of β-mannanase in corn-soybean meal diets on performance and nutrient digestibility in growing pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2013; 26(4): 579-587.
  26. Choct M. Enzymes for the feed industry: past, present and future. Worlds Poult Sci J 2006; 62(1): 5-16.
  27. Ebrahimnezhad Y, Shivazad M, Taherkhani R, et al. Effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on phytate phosphorus utilization and efficiency of microbial phytase in broiler chicks. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2008; 92(2): 168-172.
  28. Falakodin L, Hedayati M, Manafi M, et al. Effect of replacing different levels of corn with raisin by-product on production properties and digestibility in old laying hens (Hy-Line strain W-36). NVEO J 2022; 16(1): 105-117.
  29. Lioliopoulou S, Papadopoulos GA, Giannenas I, et al. Effects of dietary supplementation of pomegranate peel with xylanase on egg quality and antioxidant parameters in laying hens. Antioxidants (Basel) 2023; 12(1): 208. doi: 10.3390/antiox12010208.
  30. Broz J, Ward NE. The role of vitamins and feed enzymes in combating metabolic challenges and disorders. J Appl Poult Res 2007; 16(1): 150-159.
  31. Roberts JR. Factors affecting egg internal quality and egg shell quality in laying hens. J Poult Sci 2004; 41(3): 161-177.
  32. Ebrahimnezhad Y, Salmanzadeh M, Maheri-Sis N, et al. Effects of combination of ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid and microbial phytase on digestibility of calcium, phosphorous and mineralization parameters of tibia bone in broilers. Int J Biosci 2012; 2(12): 57-64.
  33. Apperson KD, Cherian G. Effect of whole flax seed and carbohydrase enzymes on gastrointestinal morphology, muscle fatty acids, and production performance in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2017; 96(5): 1228-1234.
  34. Jayaraman S, Thangavel G, Kurian H, et al. Bacillus subtilis PB6 improves intestinal health of broiler chickens challenged with Clostridium perfringens-induced necrotic enteritis. Poult. Sci 2013; 92(2): 370-374.
  35. Alqhtani AH, Al Sulaiman AR, Alharthi AS, et al. Effect of exogenous enzymes cocktail on performance, carcass traits, biochemical metabolites, intestinal morphology, and nutrient digestibility of broilers fed normal and low-energy corn–soybean diets. Animals (Basel) 2022; 12(9): 1094. doi: 10.3390/ani12091094.
  36. Karimi K, Zhandi M. The effect of β-mannanase and β-glucanase on small intestine morphology in male broilers fed diets containing various levels of metabolizable energy. J Appl Anim Res 2014; 43(3): 324-329.
  37. Zou J, Zheng P, Zhang K, et al. Effects of exogenous enzymes and dietary energy on performance and digestive physiology of broilers. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2013; 4(1): 14. doi: 10.1186/2049-1891-4-14.
  38. Hussain M, Mirza MA, Nawaz H, et al. Effect of exogenous protease, mannanase, and xylanase supplementation in corn and high protein corn DDGS based diets on growth performance, intestinal morphology and nutrient digestibility in broiler chickens. Braz J Poult Sci 2019; 21(04): 1088. doi: 10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1088.
  39. Yaqoob MU, Yousaf M, Iftikhar M, et al. Effect of multi-enzymes supplementation on growth performance, meat quality, ileal digestibility, digestive enzyme activity and caecal microbiota in broilers fed low-metabolizable energy diet. Animal Biosci 2022; 35(7): 1059-1068.
  40. Hassanabadi A, Nasirimoghadam H, Kermanshahi H, et al. The effect of microbial phytase on apparent digestibility of crude protein, amino acids, minerals and performance of female broiler chickens [Persian]. Iran J Anim Sci Res 2009; 1(2): 9-17.
  41. Rezaeipour V, Barsalani A, Abdullahpour R. Effects of phytase supplementation on growth performance, jejunum morphology, liver health, and serum metabolites of Japanese quails fed sesame (Sesamum indicum) meal-based diets containing graded levels of protein. Trop Anim Health Prod 2016; 48(6): 1141-1146.
  42. Saeedi Aval Noughabi K, Hassnabadi A, Nasiri Moghaddam H, et al. A comparison between the first Iranian commercial phytase and an imported phytase on the performance, blood parameters and nutrient digestibility of male broiler chicken fed different dietary phosphorous levels [Persian]. Res Anim Prod 2015; 6(11): 60-70.
  43. Daramola OT. Haematological parameters, serum metabolites and enzyme activities of broiler chicken fed with or without phytase. Asian J Adv Agric Res 2017; 2(4): 1-7.
  44. Nourmohammadi R, Hosseini SM, Farhangfar, H. Effect of citric acid and microbial phytase on serum enzyme activities and plasma minerals retention in broiler chicks. Afr J Biotechnol 2011; 10(62): 13640-13650.
  45. Zarghi H, Golian A. Effect of triticale replacement and enzyme supplementation on performance and blood chemistry of broiler chickens. J Anim Vet Adv 2009; 8(7): 1316-1321.
  46. Al-Kassie GAM. The role of peppermint (Mentha piperita) on performance in broiler diets. Agric Biol J N Am 2010; 1(5): 1009-1013.
Volume 16, Issue 4
April 2025
Pages 245-252

  • Receive Date 22 June 2024
  • Revise Date 22 August 2024
  • Accept Date 11 September 2024