Comparative effects of nano-selenium and sodium selenite ‎supplementations on fertility in aged broiler breeder males

Alavi, Mohammad Hossein; Allymehr, Manoochehr; Talebi, Alireza; Najafi, Gholamreza

doi:10.30466/vrf.2018.83172.2093

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

¹ DVSc Candidate, Department of Poultry Health and Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

² Department of Poultry Health and Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran‎

³ Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran‎

https://doi.org/10.30466/vrf.2018.83172.2093

Abstract

It is well documented that aging has negative effects on fertility. With increasing age, the activity of antioxidant enzymes are reduced and because of roosters sperm composition, a high proportion of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), the probability of sperm damage increases. The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of nano-selenium and sodium selenite on fertility in aged male broiler breeder chickens. Thirty-five male broiler breeders (Cobb 500)^® at 50 weeks of age were randomly divided into five equal groups: The control group was fed on a commercial diet, group T1 was fed on a commercial diet supplemented with sodium selenite (0.30 mg kg^-1 feed), group T2, T3 and T4 were fed on a commercial diet supplemented with nano-selenium (0.15, 0.30 and 0.60 mg kg^-1 feed, respectively). Sperm characteristics (sperm count, motility, viability, and maturity) as well as testicular histomorphometric features [tubule differentiation (TDI), spermiation (SPI), Sertoli cell (SCI) and miotic (MI) indices] were assessed. The results showed that sperm characteristics were gradually decreased with age in the control group, however, it increased in group T3. Also, TDI, SPI, SCI, and MI in group T3 were higher than those of other groups. Our findings revealed that dietary supplementations with nano-selenium boosted fertility in aged male broiler breeders and the best results were obtained when the roosters received 0.30 mg kg^-1 nano-selenium. Supplementation of nano-selenium in aged broiler breeder males might be effective to maintain flock fertility and/or increase the flock fertility.

Keywords

20.1001.1.20088140.2020.11.2.6.6

References

1. Rosenstrauch A, Degen AA, Friedländer M. Spermatozoa retention by Sertoli cells during the decline in fertility in aging roosters. Biol Reprod 1994; 50(1): 129-136.
2. Muncher Y, Sod-Moriah UA, Weil S, et al. Intratesticular retention of sperm and premature decline in fertility in the domestic rooster, Gallus domesticus. J Exp Zool 1995; 273(1): 76-81.
3. Weil S, Rozenboim I, Degen AA, et al. Fertility decline in aging roosters is related to increased testicular and plasma levels of estradiol. Gen Comp Endocrinol 1999; 115(1): 23-28.
4. Shi LG, Yang RJ, Yue WB, et al. Effect of elemental nano-selenium on semen quality, glutathione peroxidase activity, and testis ultrastructure in male Boer goats. Anim Reprod Sci 2010; 118(2–4): 248-254.
5. Ahsan U, Kamran Z, Raza I, et al. Role of selenium in male reproduction-a review. Anim Reprod Sci 2014; 146(1-2): 55-62.
6. Grashorn MA. Functionality of poultry meat. J Appl Poult Res 2007; 16(1): 99-106.
7. Surai P. Selenium in poultry nutrition 2. Reproduction, egg and meat quality and practical applications. World Poult Sci J 2002; 58(4): 431-450.
8. Grazul-Bilska AT, Caton JS, Arndt W, et al. Cellular proliferation and vascularization in ovine fetal ovaries: effects of undernutrition and selenium in maternal diet. Reproduction 2009; 137(4): 699-707.
9. Schwarz K, Foltz CM. Selenium as an integral part of factor 3 against dietary necrotic liver degeneration. Nutrition 1999; 15(3): 254-256.
10. Behne D, Höfer T, von Berswordt-Wallrabe R, et al. Selenium in the testis of the rat: studies on its regulation and its importance for the organism. J Nutr 1982; 112(9): 1682-1687.
11. Kaur P, Bansal MP. Effect of selenium-induced oxidative stress on the cell kinetics in testis and reproductive ability of male mice. Nutrition 2005; 21(3): 351-357.
12. Messaoudi I, Banni M, Saïd L, et al. Involvement of selenoprotein P and GPx4 gene expression in cadmium-induced testicular pathophysiology in rat. Chem Biol Interact 2010; 188(1): 94-101.
13. Yoon I, Werner TM, Butler JM. Effect of source and concentration of selenium on growth performance and selenium retention in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2007; 86(4): 727-730.
14. Arthur JR. The glutathione peroxidases. Cell Mol Life Sci 2000; 57(13-14): 1825-1835.
15. Food and Drug Administration. Food additives permitted in feed and drinking water of animals: Selenium. Federal Register 1987; 52: 10887.
16. Bréque C, Surai P, Brillard JP. Roles of antioxidants on prolonged storage of avian spermatozoa in vivo and in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 2003; 66(3): 314-323.
17. Pehrson B. Selenium in nutrition with special reference to the biopotency of organic and inorganic selenium compounds. In proceedings: 9^th Alltech annual symposium: Biotechnology in the Feed industry. Nottingham, UK 1993: 71-89.
18. Gao X, Zhang J, Zhang L. Hollow sphere selenium nanoparticles: Their in vitro anti hydroxyl radical effect. Adv Mater 2002; 14(4): 290-293.
19. Wang H, Zhang J, Yu H. Elemental selenium at nano size possesses lower toxicity without compromising the fundamental effect on selenoenzymes: comparison with selenomethionine in mice. Free Radical Biol Med 2007; 42(10): 1524-1533.
20. Song D, Cheng Y, Li X, et al. Biogenic nanoselenium particles effectively attenuate oxidative stress-induced intestinal epithelial barrier injury by activating the Nrf2 antioxidant pathway. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2017; 9(17): 14724-14740.
21. Zhang J, Wang H, Yan X, et al. Comparison of short-term toxicity between Nano-Se and selenite in mice. Life Sci 2005; 76(10): 1099-1109.
22. Huang B, Zhang J, Hou J, et al. Free radical scavenging efficiency of Nano-Se in vitro. Free Radic Biol Med 2003; 35(7): 805-813.
23. Cobb 500 breeder Management supplement. Available at: https://cobbstorage.blob.core.windows.net/guides/ f5ec4cd0-bc92-11e6-bd5d-55bb08833e29.pdf.Accessed Feb 18, 2016.
24. Talebi A, Alimehr M, Alavi MH, et al. Comparative study of semen traits and histomorphometric features of testes of broiler breeder males with different phenotypic traits. Vet Res Forum 2018; 9(1): 1-6.
25. Shalizar Jalali A, Hasanzadeh S. Crataegus monogyna fruit aqueous extract as a protective agent against doxorubicin-induced reproductive toxicity in male rats. Avicenna J Phytomed 2013; 3(2): 159-170.
26. Tabatabaei S, Chaji M, Mohammadabadi T. Correlation between age of rooster and semen quality in Iranian indigenous broiler breeder chickens. J Anim Vet Adv 2010; 9(1): 195-198.
27. Ebadi Manas G, Hasanzadeh S, Najafi G, et al. The effects of pyridaben pesticide on the DNA integrity of sperms and early in vitro embryonic development in mice. Iran J Reprod Med 2013; 11(8): 605-610.
28. Samour J. Avian medicine. 3^rd ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier 2015; 186.
29. Najafi G, Nejati V, Shalizar Jalali A, et al. Protective role of royal jelly in oxymetholone-induced oxidative injury in mouse testis. Iran J Toxicol 2014; 8(25): 1073-1080.
30. Rostato MP, Cinone M, Manchisi A, et al. Changes on the quality characteristics of stored semen during reproductive period of Hybrid toms. In proceedings: 12^th European poultry conference. Verona, Italy. 2006: 10-14.
31. Cerolini S, Kelso KA, Noble RC, et al. Relationship between spermatozoan lipid composition and fertility during aging of chickens. Biol Reprod 1997; 57(5): 976-980.
32. Cheng FP, Guo TJ, Wu JT, et al. Annual variation in semen characteristics of pigeons (Columba livia). Poult Sci 2002; 81(7): 1050-1056.
33. Kotłowska M, Glogowski J, Dietrich GJ, et al. Biochemical characteristics and sperm production of turkey semen in relation to strain and age of the male. Poult Sci 2005; 84(11): 1763-1768.
34. Fuerst-Waltl B, Schwarzenbacher H, Perner C, et al. Effects of age and environmental factors on semen production and semen quality of Austrain Simmental bulls. Anim Reprod Sci 2006; 95(1-2): 27-37.
35. Douard V, Hermier D, Magistrini M, et al. Reproductive period affects lipid composition and quality of fresh and stored spermatozoa in turkeys. Theriogenology 2003; 59(3-4): 753-764.
36. Surai PF, Fujihara N, Speake BK, et al. Polyunsaturated fatty acids, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant protection in avian semen. Asian Australasian J Anim Sci 2001; 14(7): 1024-1050.
37. Mohammadi S, Movahedin M, Mowla SJ. Up-regulation of CatSper genes family by selenium. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2009; 7. doi. 10.1186/1477-7827-7-126.
38. Yoon I, Werner TM, Butler JM. Effect of source and concentration of selenium on growth performance and selenium retention in broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2007; 86(4): 727-730.
39. Ebeid TA, Zeweil HS, Basyony MM, et al. Fortification of rabbit diets with vitamin E or selenium affects growth performance, lipid peroxidation, oxidative status and immune response in growing rabbits. Livest Sci 2013; 155(2-3): 323-331.
40. Sánchez-Gutiérrez M, García-Montalvo EA, Izquierdo-Vega JA, et al. Effect of dietary selenium deficiency on the in vitro fertilizing ability of mice spermatozoa. Cell Biol Toxicol 2008; 24(4): 321-329.
41. Boitani C, Puglisi R. Selenium, a key element in spermatogenesis and male fertility. Adv Exp Med Biol 2008; 636: 65-73.
42. Behne D, Wolters W. Distribution of selenium and glutathione peroxidase in the rat. J Nutr 1983; 113(2): 456-461.
43. Edens FW. Practical applications for selenomethionine: Broiler breeder reproduction. In proceedings: 18^thAlltech annual symposium. Nottingham, UK. 2002; 29-42.
44. Wang RR, Pan XJ, Peng ZQ. Effects of heat exposure on muscle oxidation and protein functionalities of pectoralis majors in broilers. Poult Sci 2009; 88(5): 1078-1084.
45. Jia X, Li N, Chen J. A subchronic toxicity study of elemental Nano-Se in Sprague-Dawley rats. Life Sci 2005; 76(17): 1989-2003.
46. Shi L, Xun W, Yue W, et al. Effect of elemental nano-selenium on feed digestibility, rumen fermentation, and purine derivatives in sheep. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2011; 163: 136-142.
47. Shi L, Xun W, Yue W, et al. Effect of sodium selenite, Se-yeast and nano-elemental selenium on growth performance, Se concentration and antioxidant status in growing male goats. Small Ruminant Res 2011; 96(1): 49-52.
48. Hu CH, Li YL, Xiong L, et al. Comparative effects of nano elemental selenium and sodium selenite on selenium retention in broiler chickens. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2012; 177(3-4): 204-210.
49. Cai SJ, Wu CX, Gong LM, et al. Effects of nano-selenium on performance, meat quality, immune function, oxidation resistance, and tissue selenium content in broilers. Poult Sci 2012; 91(10): 2532-2539.
50. El-Deep MH, Ijiri D, Ebeid TA, et al. Effects of dietary nano-selenium supplementation on growth performance, antioxidative status, and immunity in broiler chickens under thermoneutral and high ambient temperature conditions. J Poult Sci 2016; 53(4): 274-283.

Veterinary Research Forum

Comparative effects of nano-selenium and sodium selenite ‎supplementations on fertility in aged broiler breeder males

References

References

Volume 11, Issue 2
June 2020
Pages 135-141

Comparative effects of nano-selenium and sodium selenite ‎supplementations on fertility in aged broiler breeder males

References

References

Volume 11, Issue 2June 2020Pages 135-141

Volume 11, Issue 2
June 2020
Pages 135-141