Document Type : Original Article


1 MSc Graduate, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Technology, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of Khuzestan, Mollasani, ‎Ahvaz, Iran‎

2 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Technology, Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University of ‎Khuzestan, Mollasani, Ahvaz, Iran‎

3 Aquaculture Research Center-South of Iran, Iranian Fisheries Science Research Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization, Ahvaz, Iran


The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of biofloc produced from a fish pond on digestibility, rumen fermentation, rumination activity, and blood parameters of Najdi goats. At the first, 200 common carp fish (1.00 g) in two water tanks were used for producing biofloc. Then, 12 goats (average body weight of 32.00 ± 1.50 kg aging eight months) were assigned through a completely randomized design to two treatments (six replicates) and fed for one month. The treatments were comprised of a control diet and a trial diet containing 1.50% biofloc. At the end of the experiment, digestibility of nutrients, rumen fermentation, blood metabolites, and rumination activity were measured. The results showed that the digestibility of dry matter (DM), crude protein, neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF) significantly increased in goats fed with 1.50% biofloc. Also, the rumen protozoa population, plasma glucose, average time of eating, rumination, and chewing per NDF and ADF intakes, total rumination time, and chewing activity were significantly increased. There was no significant difference between treatments for DM intake, ruminal ammonia nitrogen, blood urea nitrogen, cholesterol, and triglyceride. The pH of rumen fluid significantly decreased in treatment containing biofloc. The results of the current study confessed that the use of biofloc (1.50% DM) as a supplement in Najdi goat’s diet can improve the digestibility of the diet. It is recommended further and detailed trials with different levels of biofloc in sheep or different livestock species to know more about this untapped supplement source.


  1. Hari B, Kurup BM, Varghese JT, et al. The effect of carbohydrate addition on water quality and the nitrogen budget in extensive shrimp culture systems. Aquaculture 2006; 252(2-4): 248-263.
  2. Avnimelech Y. Bio-filters: The need for a new compre-hensive approach. Aquac Eng 2006; 34(3):172-178.
  3. Avnimelech Y. Feeding with microbial floc by tilapia in minimal discharge bioflocs technology ponds. Aquaculture 2007; 264(1):140-147.
  4. Emerenciano M, Cuzon G, Goguenheim J, et al. Floc contribution on spawning performance of blue shrimp Litopenaeus stylirostris. Aquac Res 2013; 44: 75-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.03012.x.
  5. Avnimelech Y. Biofloc technology: a practical guide book. 2nd ed. Baton Rouge: USA. World Aquaculture Society 2012: 272.
  6. Kuhn DD, Boardman GD, Lawrence AL, et al. Microbial floc meal as a replacement ingredient for fish meal and soybean protein in shrimp feed. Aquaculture 2009; 296:51-57.
  7. Webster C, Lim C. Nutrient requirements and feeding of finfish for aquaculture. Oxford, UK: CABI Publishing 2002; 213-234.
  8. Little DC, Murray JF, Azim ME, et al. Options for producing a warm-water fish in the UK: limits to “Green-Growth”? Trends in Food Sci Technol 2008; 19(5): 255-264.
  9. Magondu EW. Aerobic, anaerobic and anoxic bioflocs from tilapia proximate composition. Nutritional properties and attractiveness as fish feed. MSc Thesis. Wageningen University. Wageningen, Netherlands. 2012.
  10. Logan AJ, Lawrence A, Dominy W, et al. Single-cell proteins from food byproducts provide protein in aquafeed. Global Advocate 2010; 13:56-57.
  11. Morgan KC, Wright JLC, Simpson F.J. Review of chemical constituents of the red alga Palmaria palmata (dulse). Econ Bot1980; 34: 27-50.
  12. Sharp G. 2005. Ascophyllum nodosum and its harvesting in Eastern Canada. Available at: docrep/X5819E/x5819e04.htm/.
  13. NRC. National Research Council: Nutrient require-ments of small ruminants: sheep, goats. cervids and new world camelids. National Academy of Science, Washington, DC, USA: 2007: 347.
  14. Wang G, Yu E, Xie J, et al. Effect of C/N ratio on water quality in zero-water exchange tanks and the biofloc supplementation in the feed on the growth performance of crucian carp, Carassius auratus. Aquaculture2015; 443: 98-104.
  15. Azim ME, Little DC. The biofloc technology (BFT) in indoor tanks: Water quality, biofloc composition, and growth and welfare of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaclutre 2008; 283(1-4): 29-35.
  16. Horwitz W. Official methods of analysis of AOAC international. 17th ed. Gaithersburg, USA: AOAC International 2000.
  17. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci1991; 74(10):3583-3597.
  18. Broderick GA, Kang JH. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in ruminal fluid and in vitro media. J Dairy Sci1980; 63(1):64-75.
  19. Veira DM, Ivan M, Jui PY. Rumen ciliate protozoa: effects on digestion in the stomach of sheep. J Dairy Sci1983; 66(5): 1015-1022.
  20. Kononoff PJ, Lehman HA, Heinrichs AJ. Technical note--a comparison of methods used to measure eating and ruminating activity in confined dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci2002; 85(7): 1801-1803.
  21. Beauchemin KA. Effects of dietary neutral detergent fiber concentration and alfalfa hay quality on chewing, rumen function, and milk production of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci1991; 74(9): 3140-3151.
  22. Coverdale JA, Tyler HD, Quigley III JD, et al. Effect of various levels of forage and form of diet on rumen development and growth in calves. J Dairy Sci2004; 87(8): 2554-2562.
  23. Chatterjee A, Sharma P, Ghosh MK, et al. Utilization of azolla microphylla as feed supplement for crossbred cattle. IJAFST 2013; 4(3): 207-214.
  24. Erickson PS, Trusk AM, Murphy MR. Effects of niacin source on epinephrine stimulation of plasma nonesterified fatty acid and glucose concentrations, on diet digestibility and on rumen protozoal numbers in lactating dairy cows. J Nutr 1990; 120(12): 1648-1653.
  25. Benchaar C, Calsamiglia S, Chaves AV, et al. A review of plant-derived essential oils in in ruminant nutrition and production. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2008; 145(1-4): 209-228.
  26. Thompson LN. The effects of Ascophyllum nodosum for alleviation of heat stress in cattle. MSc Thesis. University of Missouri, USA: 2004.
  27. Kholif AE, Elghandour MMY, Salem AZM, et al. The effects of three total mixed rations with different concentrate to maize silage ratios and different levels of microalgae Chlorella vulgaris on in vitro total gas, methane and carbon dioxide production. J Agric Sci2017; 55(3):494-507.
  28. Wang Y, Xu Z, Bach SJ, et al. Effects of phlorotannins from Ascophyllum nodosum (brown seaweed) on in vitro ruminal digestion of mixed forage or barley grain. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2008; 145(1-4): 375-395.
  29. Gardiner GE, Campbell AJ, O’Doherty JV, et al. Effect of Ascophyllum nodosum extract on growth performance, digestibility, carcass characteristics and selected intestinal microflora populations of grower–finisher pigs. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2008; 141: 259-273.
  30. Bernabucci U, Lacetera N, Danieli PP, et al. Influence of different periods of exposure to hot environment on rumen function and diet digestibility in sheep. Inter J Biometeorol 2009; 53(5): 387-395.
  31. Stern JL, Hagerman AE, Steinberg PD, et al. Phlorotannin-protein interactions. J Chem Ecol 1996; 22(10): 1877-1899.
  32. Church DC. Digestive physiology and nutrition of ruminants. 3rd ed. Corvallis, USA: O & B Books Inc. 1983; 452.
  33. Kumar R, Dass RS. Effect of niacin supplementation on growth, nutrient utilization and blood biochemical profile in male buffalo calves.Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2006; 19(10): 1422-1428.
  34. Fike J, Saker K, O’keefec S, et al. Effect of Tasco (a seaweed extract) and heat stress on N metabolism and meat fatty acids in wither lambs fed hays containing endophyte-infected fescue. J Small Rum Res 2005; 60: 237-245.
  35. Ahirwar MK, Leela V, Balakrishnan V. In-vitro fermentation pattern of Azollia pinnata as protein supplement in forage based diet for ruminants. Indian Vet J2009; 68(1): 60-62.
  36. Kannan G, Terrill T, Kouakou B, et al. Blood metabolite changes and live weight loss following brown seaweed extract supplementation in goats subjected to stress. Small Rum Res 2007; 73(1): 228-234.
  37. Lohölter M, Meyer U, Rauls C, et al. Effects of niacin supplementation and dietary concentrate proportion on body temperature, ruminal pH and milk performance of primiparous dairy cows. J Anim Nutr 2013; 67(3): 202-218.
  38. Chen G, Russell JB. More monensin-sensetive, ammonia-producing bacteria from the rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol 1989; 55(5): 1052-1057.
  39. Braden KW, Blanton JR, Allen VG, et al. Ascophyllum nodosum supplementation: preharvest intervention for reducing Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella spp. in feedlot steers. J Food Protec 2004; 67(9):1824-1828.
  40. El-Sabagh MR, Abd Eldaim MA, Mahboub DH, et al. Effects of spirulina platensis algae on growth performance, antioxidative status and blood meta-bolites in fattening lambs. J Agric Sci 2014; 6(3):92-98.
  41. Seal CJ, Parker DS. Effect of intraruminal propionic acid infusion on metabolism of mesenteric- and portal-drained viscera in growing steers fed a forage diet: I. Volatile fatty acids, glucose, and lactate. J Anim Sci 1994; 72: 1325-1334.
  42. McSweeney CS, Palmer B, Bunch R, et al. Isolation and characterization of proteolytic ruminal bacteria from sheep and goats fed the tannin-containing shrub legume Calliandra calothyrsus. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999; 65(7):3075-3083.
  43. Teimouri Yansari A, Valizadeh R, Naserian A, et al. Effects of alfalfa particle size and specific gravity on chewing activity, digestibility, and performance of Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci2004; 87(11): 3912-3924.
  44. Yang WZ, Beauchemin KA. Effects of physically effective fiber on chewing activity and ruminal pH of dairy cows fed diets based on barley silage. J Dairy Sci2006; 89(1): 217-228.
  45. Tafaj M, Steingass H, Drochner W. Influence of hay particle size at different concentrate and feeding levels on digestive processes and feed intake in ruminants. Passage, digestibility and feed intake. Arch Tierernahr 2001; 54(3): 243-259.