A comparative study on the expression of myogenic genes, and their effects on performance and meat quality in broiler chicken strains

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 DVSc Candidate, Department of Poultry Health and Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

2 Department of Poultry Health and Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

3 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

Abstract
The aims of current investigation were to study the growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality and expression profile of Myostatin (MSTN), Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-I), Myogenin (MyoG) and Myogenic regulatory factor 4 (MRF4) genes in three commercial broiler strains including Ross (Ross 308), Cobb (Cobb 500), and Arian in 2023. A total number of 240 one-day-old chicks were reared under an equalized standard management condition for 6 weeks. Performance, organ weights, meat quality and the expression level of the myogenic genes in the pectoral muscle were investigated. The lowest body weight (BW), feed intake, weight gain and highest feed conversion ratio (FCR) was observed for Arian at the end of the study. The meat quality was similar between strains. The IGF-I expression level was significantly higher on 42 days of age in Cobb compared to Ross and Arian. The MRF4 expression level was significantly higher on 28 days of age in Cobb compared to Ross. The MyoG expression level was significantly lower in Arian compared to Cobb on 42 days of age. Furthermore, the MSTN expression level was significantly lower in Cobb compared to Ross and Arian on 42 days of age. The remarkable differences in gene expression levels at the end of the rearing period was supported by higher growth performance and BW of Cobb compared to Ross and Arian strains. In conclusion, the findings of current study could conveniently help assess the performance of these broiler strains under similar rearing condition.

Keywords

Subjects


  1. Chatellier V. Review: international trade in animal products and the place of the European Union: main trends over the last 20 years. Animal 2021; 15(Suppl 1): 100289. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2021.100289.
  2. Daghir N, Diab-El-Harake M, Kharroubi S. Poultry production and its effects on food security in the Middle Eastern and North African region. J Appl Poult Res 2021; 30(1): 100110. doi: 10.1016/j.japr.2020.10.009.
  3. de Vries M, de Boer IJM. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: a review of life cycle assessments. Livest Sci 2010; 128(1-3): 1-11.
  4. Vaarst M, Steenfeldt S, Horsted K. Sustainable development perspectives of poultry production. Worlds Poult Sci J 2015; 71(4): 609-620.
  5. Perry RL, Rudnick MA. Molecular mechanisms regulating myogenic determination and differentiation. Front Biosci 2000; 5: D750-D767.
  6. Jia Y, Gao G, Song H, et al. Low-protein diet fed to crossbred sows during pregnancy and lactation enhances myostatin gene expression through epigenetic regulation in skeletal muscle of weaning piglets. Eur J Nutr 2016; 55(3): 1307-1314.
  7. Hennebry A, Berry C, Siriett V, et al. Myostatin regulates fiber-type composition of skeletal muscle by regulating MEF2 and MyoD gene expression. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2009; 296(3): C525-C534.
  8. Wang Q, McPherron AC. Myostatin inhibition induces muscle fibre hypertrophy prior to satellite cell activation. J Physiol 2012; 590(Pt 9): 2151-2165.
  9. Reisz-Porszasz S, Bhasin S, Artaza JN, et al. Lower skeletal muscle mass in male transgenic mice with muscle-specific overexpression of myostatin. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2003; 285(4): E876-E888.
  10. Scanes CG. Perspectives on the endocrinology of poultry growth and metabolism. Gen Comp Endocrinol 2009; 163(1-2): 24-32.
  11. Xiao Y, Wu C, Li K, et al. Association of growth rate with hormone levels and myogenic gene expression profile in broilers. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2017; 8: 43. doi: 10.1186/s40104-017-0170-8.
  12. Posey Jr AD, Demonbreun A, McNally EM. Ferlin proteins in myoblast fusion and muscle growth. Curr Top Dev Biol 2011; 96: 203-230.
  13. Rahimi S, Esmaeilzadeh L, Karimi Torshizi MA. Comparison of growth performance of six commercial broiler hybrids in Iran. Iran J Vet Res 2006; 7(2): 38-44.
  14. Rostagno HS, Albino LFT, Donzele JL, et al. Brazilian tables for poultry and swine: composition of feedstuffs and nutritional requirements. 3rd Viçosa, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Zootecnia 2011; 116-121.
  15. Collett SR. Principles of disease prevention, diagnosis, and control. In: Swayne DE, Boulianne M, Logue CM, et al (Eds). Diseases of poultry. 14th Florida, USA: Wiley Blackwell 2020; 2-78.
  16. Soares CE, Dahlke F, Netto DP, et al. Chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) cuts yield specifics of Cobb 500 slow and Hubbard Flex hybrids. Food Public Health 2017; 7(1): 23-28.
  17. Cevger Y, Sariozkan S, Guler H. Impact of manual and mechanical cut-up of broiler carcasses on the enterprise income. Vet Med 2003; 48(9): 248-253.
  18. Hamm D. Unconventional meat harvesting. Poult Sci 1981; 60: 1666.
  19. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc 2008; 3(6): 1101-1108.
  20. Ahlberg E, Jenmalm MC, Tingö L. Evaluation of five column-based isolation kits and their ability to extract MIRNA from human milk. J Cell Mol Med 2021; 25 (16): 7973-7979.
  21. KokoszyƄski D, Bernacki Z, Saleh M, et al. Body conformation and internal organs characteristics of different commercial broiler lines. Rev Bras Cienc Avic 2017; 19(1): 47-52.
  22. Al-Marzooqi W, Al-Maskari ZAS, Johnson EH, et al. Comparative evaluation of growth performance, meat quality and intestinal development of indigenous and commercial chicken strains. Int J Poult Sci 2019; 18(4): 174-180.
  23. Benyi K, Tshilate TS, Netshipale AJ, et al. Effects of genotype and sex on the growth performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Trop Anim Health Prod 2015; 47(7): 1225-1231.
  24. Ojedapo LO, Akinokun O, Adedeji TA, et al. Effect of strain and sex on carcass characteristics of three commercial broilers reared in deep litter system in the derived savannah area of Nigeria. World J Agric Sci 2008; 4(4): 487-491.
  25. Cruz RFA, Vieira SL, Kindlein L, et al. Occurrence of white striping and wooden breast in broilers fed grower and finisher diets with increasing lysine levels. Poult Sci 2017; 96(2): 501-510.
  26. Gonzales E, Buyse J, Takita TS, et al. Metabolic disturbances in male broilers of different strains. 1. Performance, mortality, and right ventricular hypertrophy. Poult Sci 1998; 77(11): 1646-1653.
  27. Farran MT, Khalil RF, Uwayjan MG, et al. Performance and carcass quality of commercial broiler strains. J Appl Poult Res 2000; 9(2): 252-257.
  28. Ravindran V, Hew LI, Ravindran G, et al. Influence of xylanase supplementation on the apparent metabolisable energy and ileal amino acid digestibility in adiet containing wheat and oats, and on the performance of three strains of broiler chickens. Aust J Agric Res 1999; 50:1159-1163.
  29. Siaga R, Baloyi JJ, Rambau MD, et al. Effects of stocking density and genotype on the growth performance of male and female broiler chickens. Asian J Poult Sci 2017; 11(2): 96-104.
  30. Schmidt CJ, Persia ME, Feierstein E, et al. Comparison of a modern broiler line and a heritage line unselected since the 1950s. Poult Sci 2009; 88(12): 2610-2619.
  31. Udeh I, Ezebor PN, Akporahuarho PO. Growth performance and carcass yield of three commercial strains of broiler chickens raised in a tropical environment. J Biol Agric Healthc 2015; 5: 62-67.
  32. Mussini FJ. Comparative response of different broiler genotypes to dietary nutrient levels. Arkansas, USA: University of Arkansas 2012; 1-10.
  33. Ikusika OO, Falowo AB, Mpendulo CT, et al. Effect of strain, sex and slaughter weight on growth performance, carcass yield and quality of broiler meat. Open Agric 2020; 5: 607-616.
  34. Jawasreh K, Al Athamneh S, Al-Zghoul MB, et al. Evaluation of growth performance and muscle marker genes expression in four different broiler strains in Jordan. Ital J Anim Sci 2019; 18(1): 766-776.
  35. Singh M, Lim AJ, Muir WI, et al. Comparison of performance and carcass composition of a novel slow-growing crossbred broiler with fast-growing broiler for chicken meat in Australia. Poult Sci 2021; 100(3): 100966. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.063.
  36. Jaspal MH, Ali S, Rajput N, et al. Fatty acid profiling and comparative evaluation of carcass cut up yield, meat quality traits of Cobb Sasso, commercial broiler and native aseel chicken. Pure Appl Biol 2020; 9(1): 56-65.
  37. Reddish JM, Lilburn MS. A comparison of growth and development patterns in diverse genotypes of broilers. 1. Male broiler growth. Poult Sci 2004; 83(7): 1067-1071.
  38. Choo YK, Oh ST, Lee KW, et al. The growth performance, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of egg-type male growing chicken and white-mini broiler in comparison with commercial broiler (Ross 308). Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour 2014; 34(5): 622-629.
  39. López KP, Schilling MW, Corzo A. Broiler genetic strain and sex effects on meat characteristics. Poult Sci 2011; 90(5): 1105-1111.
  40. Abdullah AY, Matarneh SK. Broiler performance and the effects of carcass weight, broiler sex, and postchill carcass aging duration on breast fillet quality characteristics. J Appl Poult Res 2010; 19 (1): 46-58.
  41. Zheng Q, Zhang Y, Chen Y, et al. Systematic identification of genes involved in divergent skeletal muscle growth rates of broiler and layer chickens. BMC Genomics 2009; 10: 87. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-87.
  42. Davis RVN, Lamont SJ, Rothschild MF, et al. Transcriptome analysis of post-hatch breast muscle in legacy and modern broiler chickens reveals enrichment of several regulators of myogenic growth. PLoS One 2015; 10(3): e0122525. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0122525.
  43. Zhang R, Li R, Zhi L, et al. Expression profiles and associations of muscle regulatory factor (MRF) genes with growth traits in Tibetan chickens. Br Poult Sci 2018; 59(1): 63-67.
  44. Yin HD, Li DY, Zhang L, et al. Housing system influences abundance of Pax3 and Pax7 in postnatal chicken skeletal muscles. Poult Sci 2014; 93(6): 1337-1343.
  45. Li H, Zhu C, Tao Z, et al. MyoD and Myf6 gene expression patterns in skeletal muscle during embryonic and posthatch development in the domestic duck (Anas platyrhynchos domestica). J Anim Breed Genet 2014; 131(3): 194-201.
  46. Zhu L, Li X-W, Shuai S-R, et al. The phylogeny analysis of MyoG gene in different pig breeds. Interdiscip Sci 2010; 2(2): 175-179.
  47. Lalani R, Bhasin S, Byhower F, et al. Myostatin and insulin-like growth factor-I and-II expression in the muscle of rats exposed to the microgravity environment of the NeuroLab space shuttle flight. J Endocrinol 2000; 167(3): 417-428.
  48. Lee S-J. Regulation of muscle mass by myostatin. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2004; 20: 61-86.
  49. Kocamis H, Killefer J. Myostatin expression and possible functions in animal muscle growth. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2002; 23(4): 447-454.
Volume 15, Issue 5
May 2024
Pages 243-250

  • Receive Date 28 October 2023
  • Revise Date 22 January 2024
  • Accept Date 03 February 2024