Pathological and molecular characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in necropsied tissues of sambar deer (Rusa unicolor) and nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus) from Assam state, India

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Advanced Animal Disease Diagnosis and Management Consortium, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Guwahati, India

2 Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Guwahati, India

3 Department of Animal Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Guwahati, India

4 Assam State Zoo, Guwahati, India

5 Department of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Guwahati, India

6 Indian Council of Agricultural Research Complex for North Eastern Hill Region, Umiam, India

Abstract
Bovine tuberculosis is a chronic bacterial disease primarily caused by Mycobacterium bovis, a member of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC), with significant zoonotic implications. This study aimed to detect MTBC in wildlife species, specifically nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus) and sambar deer (Rusa unicolor), using gross pathology, histopathology, acid-fast staining, and molecular confirmation. Necropsied tissue samples were collected during post-mortem examination of a nilgai and a sambar deer from the Assam State Zoo, Guwahati, India. Macroscopically, multiple granulomatous tubercles of varying sizes were observed in the lungs and liver, with creamy white caseous material marked upon sectioning. Ziehl-Neelsen staining of the tissue smears from granulomatous lesions confirmed the presence of acid-fast bacilli. Microscopic examination of tuberculosis granulomas revealed a central necrotic mass surrounded by inflammatory cell infiltration, including Langerhans-type giant cells. Molecular confirmation of MTBC infection was achieved by amplifying hsp65 and IS1081 in tissue samples, further validated by Basic Local Alignment Search Tool for nucleotide analysis following Sanger dideoxy sequencing. In conclusion, this study confirmed the presence of tuberculosis in these wildlife species through an integrated approach combining pathology, microbiology, and molecular diagnostics, highlighting the need to understand pathogen entry into the herd and prevent potential spillover.

Keywords

Subjects

1.     Orgeur M, Brosch R. Evolution of virulence in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Curr Opin Microbiol 2018; 41: 68-75.
2.     Refaya, AK, Bhargavi G, Mathew NC, et al. A review on bovine tuberculosis in India. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2020; 122: 101923. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2020.101923.
3.     Kanipe C, Palmer MV. Mycobacterium bovis and you: a comprehensive look at the bacteria, its similarities to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and its relationship with human disease. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2020; 125: 102006. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2020.102006.
4.     Cadmus S, Akinseye VO, van Soolingen D. Mycobacterium bovis in humans and M. tuberculosis in animals in Nigeria: an overview from 1975-2014. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2019; 23(11): 1162-1170.
5.     O'Reilly LM, Daborn CJ. The epidemiology of Mycobacterium bovis infections in animals and man: a review. Tuber Lung dis 1995; 76(Suppl 1): 1-46.
6.     Gortazar C, Vicente J., Gavier-Widén D. Pathology of bovine tuberculosis in the European wild boar (Sus scrofa). Vet Rec 2003; 152(25):779-780.
7.     Vicente J, Höfle U, Garrido JM, et al. Risk factors associated with the prevalence of tuberculosis-like lesions in fenced wild boar and red deer in south central Spain. Vet Res 2007; 38(3): 451-464.
8.     Rowe MT, Donaghy J. Mycobacterium bovis: the importance of milk and dairy products as a cause of human tuberculosis in the UK. A review of taxonomy and culture methods, with particular reference to artisanal cheeses. Int J Dairy Technol 2008; 61(4): 317-326.
9.     Kirk MD, Pires SM, Black RE, et al. World health organization estimates of the global and regional disease burden of 22 foodborne bacterial, protozoal, and viral diseases, 2010: a data synthesis. PLoS Med 2015; 12(12): e1001921. doi: 10.1371/journal. pmed.1001921.
10. Naranjo V, Gortazar C, Vicente J, et al. Evidence of the role of European wild boar as a reservoir of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Vet Microbiol 2008; 127(1-2): 1-9.
11. Eisenach KD, Sifford MD, Cave MD, et al. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum samples using a polymerase chain reaction. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991; 144(5): 1160-1163.
12. Tuncay C, Hatipoğlu F. The pathology of tuberculosis lesions in allergic skin test (PPD tuberculin) positive cows and detection of tuberculosis agents with PCR in milk samples. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2018; 42(3): 184-190.
13. Saidu AS, Okolocha EC, Gamawa AA, et al. Occurrence and distribution of bovine tuberculosis (Myco-bacterium bovis) in slaughtered cattle in the abattoirs of Bauchi State, Nigeria. Vet World 2015; 8(3): 432-437.
14. Telenti A, Imboden P, Marchesi F, et al. Direct, automated detection of rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction and single-strand conformation poly-morphism analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993; 37(10): 2054-2058.
15. Wards BJ, Collins DM, de Lisle GW. Detection of Mycobacterium bovis in tissues by polymerase chain reaction. Vet Microbiol 1995; 43(2-3): 227-240.
16. Rodríguez JG, Fissanoti JC, Del Portillo P, et al. Amplification of a 500-base-pair fragment from cultured isolates of Mycobacterium bovis. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37(7): 2330-2332.
17. Fico R, Mariacher A, Franco A, et al. Systemic tuberculosis by Mycobacterium bovis in a free-ranging Marsican brown bear (Ursus Arctos Marsicanus): a case report. BMC Vet Res 2019; 15(1): 152. doi: 10.1186/s12917-019-1910-0.
18. O'brien DJ, Schmitt SM, Fitzgerald SD, et al. Managing the wildlife reservoir of Mycobacterium bovis: the Michigan, USA, experience. Vet Microbiol 2006; 112(2-4): 313-323.
19. Palmer MV, Whipple DL, Payeur JB, et al. Naturally occurring tuberculosis in white tailed deer. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000; 216(12): 1921-1924.
20. Espie IW, Hlokwe TM, Gey van Pittius NC, et al. Pulmonary infection due to Mycobacterium bovis in a black rhinoceros (Dicerosbicornis minor) in South Africa. J Wildlife Dis 2009; 45(4): 1187-1193.
21. Bermudez HR, Renteria ET, Medina BG, et al. Correlation between histophatological, bacteriological and PCR diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. J Anim Vet Adv 2010; 9(15): 2082-2084.
22. Ozturk-Gurgen H, Rieseberg B, Leipig-Rudolph M, et al. Morphology of naturally-occurring tuberculosis in cattle caused by Mycobacterium caprae. J Comp Pathol 2020; 174: 120-139.
23. Verma R, Sharma AK, Sangram Ramane P, et al. Generalized tuberculosis in nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus) caused by Mycobecterium fortuitum. Indian J Vet Pathol 2012; 36(1): 33-36.
24. Filia G, Leishangthem GD, Mahajan V, et al. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis in Sahiwal cattle from an organized farm using ante-mortem techniques. Vet World 2016; 9(4): 383-387.
25. Rodriguez-Campos S, Smith NH, Boniotti MB, et al. Overview and phylogeny of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms: implications for diagnostics and legislation of bovine tuberculosis. Res Vet Sci 2014; 97(Supplement): S5-S19
26. Akhtar R, Sadiqa M, Tipu MY, et al. Use of molecular probes for presumptive diagnosis of tuberculosis associated with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis infection in antelopes in Pakistan. Pak Vet J 2019; 39(2): 316-319.
27. Duffy SC, Srinivasan S, Schilling MA, et al. Reconsidering Mycobacterium bovis as a proxy for zoonotic tuberculosis: a molecular epidemiological surveillance study. Lancet Microbe 2020; 1(2): e66-e73.
28. Figueiredo AA, Lucon AM, Arvellos AN, et al. A better understanding of urogenital tuberculosis patho-physiology based on radiological findings. Eur J Radiol 2010; 76(2): 246-257.
Volume 17, Issue 5
May 2026
Pages 333-338

  • Receive Date 21 May 2025
  • Revise Date 18 August 2025
  • Accept Date 11 October 2025