Veterinary Research Forum

Effects of agr genotype on biofilm-forming ability in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates from broiler chickens

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Sahar Nouri Gharajelar 1, 2
Pariya Heasri 3
Masoumeh Firouzamandi 1
Roghaiyeh Akbari 3

1 Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

2 Department of Pathobiology and Veterinary Science, College of Agriculture, Health and Natural Resources, University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA

3 Master Student of Veterinary Bacteriology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran

10.30466/vrf.2025.2053976.4671
Abstract
The Accessory Gene Regulator (agr) operon as part of the quorum-sensing system, is responsible for regulating numerous virulence factors in Staphylococci. Furthermore, the ability of the opportunistic pathogen Staphylococcus pseudintermedius to form biofilm is a significant contributor to chronic diseases. Our aim was to evaluate of the association between different agr groups and the expression of the icaD gene related to biofilm formation among S. pseudintermedius isolates from nasal samples. Fifty nasal swabs were collected from broiler chickens and phenotypic and molecular tests were performed to isolate S. pseudintermedius from the samples and investigate their agr genotype. The biofilm production capacity of the isolates was determined using both a microtiter plate assay and amplification of the icaD gene. The S. pseudintermedius was detected in the 86.84% of samples. The assessment of agr typing results revealed that most of the strains (69.70%) were classified in agr group I. The relative frequency of biofilm producing S. pseudintermedius isolates was 75.76% and all of them harbored the icaD gene. The expression level of the icaD determinant was significantly higher among isolates in agr group I than other agr groups. These results suggest that broiler chickens may act as a reservoir for the transmission of S. pseudintermedius to humans which should be considered a potential zoonotic bacterium capable of producing different virulence factors like biofilms.

Keywords

agr group
Biofilm
Broiler chicken
icaD gene
Staphylococcus pseudintermedius
Subjects
1.     Pitchenin LC, Brandão LNS, Rosa JMA, et al. Occurrence of toxin genes in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from diseased dogs and other domestic and wild species. J Infect Dev Ctries 2018; 11(12): 957-961
2.     Sareyyupoglu B, Mustak HK, Cantekin Z, et al. Molecular detection of exfoliative toxin in Staphylo-coccus intermedius isolates from dogs with pyoderma. Ankara Univ Vet Fak Derg 2013; 60(1): 15-19.
3.     van Duijkeren E, Catry B, Greko C, et al. Review on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011; 66(12): 2705-2714.
4.     Garbacz K, Zarnowska S, Piechowicz L, et al. Pathogenicity potential of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius strains isolated from canine carriers and from dogs with infection signs. Virulence 2013; 4(3): 255-259.
5.     Torlak E, Korkut E, Uncu AT, et al. Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus isolates from a dental clinic in Konya, Turkey. J Infect Public Health 2017; 10(6): 809-813.
6.     Pinto JB, Rossatt FCP, Martins PD, et al. Genetic relationships and virulence factors in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from raw poultry in South Brazil. Ann Microbiol 2015; 65, 1933-1940.
7.     Ghasemian A, Najar-Peerayeh S, Bakhshi B, et al. High prevalence of icaABCD genes responsible for biofilm formation in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from hospitalized children, Arch Pediatr Infect Dis 2015; 3(3): e20703.doi: 10.5812/pedinfect.20703v2.
8.     Sakoulas G, Eliopoulos GM, Moellering RC Jr, et al. Accessory gene regulator (agr) locus in geograohically diverse Staphylococcus aureus isolates with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46(5): 1492-1502.
9.     Shopsin B, Mathema B, Alcabes P, et al. Prevalence of agr specificity groups among Staphylococcus aureus strains colonizing children and their guardians. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41(1): 456-459.
10. Ghasemian A, Najar-Peerayeh S, Bakhshi B, et al. Accessory gene regulator specificity groups among Staphylococcus aureus isolated from hospitalized children. Arch Pediatr Infect Dis 2014; 2(4): e16096. doi: 10.5812/pedinfect.16096.
11. Gharsa H, Ben Slama K, Gómez-Sanz E, et al. Antimicrobial resistance, virulence genes, and genetic lineages of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in healthy dogs in Tunisia. Microb Ecol 2013; 66(2): 363-368.
12. Sasaki T, Tsubakishita S, Tanaka Y, et al. Multiplex-PCR method for species identification of coagulase-positive staphylococci. J Clin Microbiol 2010; 48(3): 765-769.
13. Nouri Gharajalar S, Shahbazi P. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of biofilm forming Staphylococcus aureus isolated from pigeon external ocular infections. J Exot Pet Med 2018; 27(2): 81-84.
14. Meroni G, Soares Filipe JF, Drago L, et al. Investigation on antibiotic- resistance, biofilm formation and virulence factors in multi-drug resistant and non multi drug resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Microorganisms 2019; 7(12): 702. doi: 10.3390/ microorganisms7120702.
15. Roberts E, Nuttall TJ, Gkekas G, et al. Not just in man's best friend: a review of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius host range and human zoonosis. Res Vet Sic 2024; 174: 105305. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc. 2024.105305.
16. Bierowiec K, Miszczak M, Korzeniowska-Kowal A, et al. Epidemiology of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in cats in Poland. Sci Rep 2021; 11(1): 18898. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97976-z.
17. Lee GY, Lee HH, Um HS, et al. Profiles of enterotoxin genes and antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius strains isolated from livestock and companion animals. J Food Hyg Saf 2019; 34(6): 576-582.
18. Bourguignon E, Viçosa GN, Corsini CMM, et al. Description of methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from canine pyoderma in Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2016; 68(2): 299-306.
19. Botoni LS, Scherer CB, Silva RO, et al. Prevalence andin vitro susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from skin and nostrils of dogs with superficial pyoderma. Pesqui Vet Bras 2016; 36(12): 1178-1180.
20. Brati B, Petri O, Abazaj E, et al. Prevalence of MRSA and agr specificity groups among Staphylococcus aureus strains colonizing hospitalized patients in tertiary hospital center. IJEES 2020; 10(2): 401-408.
21. Little SV, Bryan LK, Hillhouse AE, et al. Characterization of agr groups of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolates from dogs in Texas. mSphere 2019; 4(2): e00033-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00033-19.
22. Bannoehr J, Ben Zakour NL, Waller AS, et al. Population genetic structure of the Staphylococcus intermedius group: insights into agr diversification and the emergence of methicillin-resistant strains. J Bacteriol 2007; 189(23): 8685-8692.
23. Nouri Gharajalar S. Evaluation of antimicrobial resistance patterns of biofilm forming Escherichia coli isolated from humans and chickens. JZD 2017; 2(2): 17-26.
24. Cafiso V, Bertuccio T, Santagati M, et al. agr-genotyping and transcriptional analysis of biofilm-producing Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2007; 51(1): 220-227.
25. Nemati M, Hermans K, Devriese LA, et al. Screening of genes encoding adhesion factors and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from poultry. Avian Pathol 2009; 38(6): 513-517.
26. Singh A, Walker M, Rousseau J, et al. Characterization of the biofilm forming ability of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius from dogs. BMC Vet Res 2013; 9: 93. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-93.
27. Marques VF, Santos HA, Santos TH, et al. Expression of icaA and icaD genes in biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from bovine subclinical mastitis. PesqVet Bras 2021; 41: e06645. doi: 10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-6645.
28. Hamel Mohaisen S, Hussain Ali M, Hashem Shehab Z, et al. Effect of ultraviolet light on the expression of icaD gene in Staphylococcus aureus local isolates in Iraq. Arch Razi Inst 2021; 76(5): 1221-1227.
Veterinary Research Forum
Volume 17, Issue 8
August 2026
Pages 573-579

  • Receive Date 20 February 2025
  • Revise Date 11 August 2025
  • Accept Date 15 November 2025

Home

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Reviewers

Contact Us